Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920649›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2023

Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S-ICD screening.

Mohamed ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Benedict M Wiles, Anthony J Dunn, Stefano Coniglio, Alain B Zemkoho, John Morgan, Paul R Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S-ICD screening.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed ElRefaiCardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-1940
Mohamed AbouelasaadCardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Benedict M WilesAberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland, UK.
Anthony J DunnSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Stefano ConiglioDepartment of Economics, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Alain B ZemkohoSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
John MorganFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul R RobertsCardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Bergamo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are practical limitations to acquiring longer durations of ECG signals for S-ICD screening. This study explored the potential use of deep learning methods in S-ICD screening.

methodsThis was a retrospective study. A deep learning tool was used to provide descriptive analysis of the T:R ratios over 24 h recordings of S-ICD vectors. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to compare the results statistically to those of a "gold standard" S-ICD simulator.

resultsA total of 14 patients (mean age: 63.7 ± 5.2 years, 71.4% male) were recruited and 28 vectors were analyzed. Mean T:R, standard deviation of T:R, and favorable ratio time (FVR)-a new concept introduced in this study-for all vectors combined were 0.21 ± 0.11, 0.08 ± 0.04, and 79 ± 30%, respectively. There were statistically significant strong correlations between the outcomes of our novel tool and the S-ICD simulator (p < .001).

conclusionDeep learning methods could provide a practical software solution to analyze data acquired for longer durations than current S-ICD screening practices. This could help select patients better suited for S-ICD therapy as well as guide vector selection in S-ICD eligible patients. Further work is needed before this could be translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDefibrillators, ImplantableAgedDeath, Sudden, CardiacElectrocardiographyFemaleHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesdeep learning toolsscreeningsubcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators

Identifiers

PMID36920649
PMCPMC10335624
OpenAlexW4324311583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.