Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920521›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Real world impact of added FFR-CT to coronary CT angiography on clinical decision-making and patient prognosis - IMPACT FFR study.

Leonie M Becker, Joyce Peper, Bram J L A Verhappen, Laurens A Swart, Admir Dedic, Willem G van Dockum, Martin van der Ent, Kees-Jan Royaards, André Niezen, Jan-Hein J Hensen and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Computed Tomography and Coronary Plaque Analysis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-invasive physiological assessment of coronary artery obstruction on coronary computed tomography angiography.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Review
  18. Selective FFRThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonie M BeckerDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. l.becker@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.
Joyce PeperDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Bram J L A VerhappenDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Laurens A SwartDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Admir DedicDepartment of Cardiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Willem G van DockumDepartment of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin van der EntDepartment of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees-Jan RoyaardsDepartment of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
André NiezenDepartment of Radiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Hein J HensenDepartment of Radiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Peter van KuijkDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Firdaus A A Mohamed HoeseinDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tobias A BruningDepartment of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin J SwaansDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Maasstad Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe addition of CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT) increases the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We assessed the impact of FFR-CT in routine clinical practice on clinical decision-making and patient prognosis in patients suspected of stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

methodsThis retrospective, single-center study compared a cohort that received CCTA with FFR-CT to a historical cohort that received CCTA before FFR-CT was available. We assessed the clinical management decisions after FFR-CT and CCTA and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during the 1-year follow-up using chi-square tests for independence. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize the occurrence of safety outcomes over time.

resultsA total of 360 patients at low to intermediate risk of CAD were included, 224 in the CCTA only group, and 136 in the FFR-CT group. During follow-up, 13 MACE occurred in 12 patients, 9 (4.0%) in the CCTA group, and three (2.2%) in the FFR-CT group. Clinical management decisions differed significantly between both groups. After CCTA, 60 patients (26.5%) received optimal medical therapy (OMT) only, 115 (51.3%) invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and 49 (21.9%) single positron emission CT (SPECT). After FFR-CT, 106 patients (77.9%) received OMT only, 27 (19.9%) ICA, and three (2.2%) SPECT (p < 0.001 for all three options). The revascularization rate after ICA was similar between groups (p = 0.15). However, patients in the CCTA group more often underwent revascularization (p = 0.007).

conclusionAddition of FFR-CT to CCTA led to a reduction in (invasive) diagnostic testing and less revascularizations without observed difference in outcomes after 1 year. KEY POINTS: • Previous studies have shown that computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve improves the accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography without changes in acquisition protocols. • This study shows that use of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography in patients suspected of stable coronary artery disease leads to less invasive testing and revascularization without observed difference in outcomes after 1 year. • This could lead to a significant reduction in costs, complications and (retrospectively unnecessary) usage of diagnostic testing capacity, and a significant increase in patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialClinical Decision-MakingComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomography angiographyCoronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserve, myocardialStable angina

Identifiers

PMID36920521
PMCPMC10326083
OpenAlexW4324305928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.