ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Deep learning for automated, interpretable classification of lumbar spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy from axial MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning assisted segmentation of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- A stacking based deep learning framework integrating random search neural architecture search for meniscus tear diagnosis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Spine Neuroimaging: Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Lower Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Uncertainty Quantification of Central Canal Stenosis Deep Learning Classifier From Lumbar Sagittal T2-Weighted MRI.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Multimodal Vision Frontier Models With Lumbar Spine MRIs for Grading Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Medical Spine Sagittal MRI Dataset for Segmentation and Foraminal Stenosis detection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Automatic detection of spinal pathologies based on MRI scans.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Deep learning models for lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI: model comparison and clinical benchmarking.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Anatomy-guided context-aware deep learning for lumbar degenerative disease grading and burden-aware risk assessment on MRI.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Application of Deep Learning for Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multicenter Evaluation of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted versus Manual Reading on Diagnostic Agreement with the Reference Standard.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Facet Joints Osteoarthritis Radiological Features on Lumbar CT: A Multitask Deep Learning Approach.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on the Management of Lumbar Degenerative Pathology: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Radiologist Productivity with Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Torg-Pavlov ratio qualification to diagnose developmental cervical spinal stenosis based on HRViT neural network.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- AI-based lumbar central canal stenosis classification on sagittal MR images is comparable to experienced radiologists using axial images.European radiology · 2025Article
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification of the dural sac cross-sectional area in lumbar spine MRI.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Convolutional Neural Network Incorporating Multiple Attention Mechanisms for MRI Classification of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate a deep learning model for automated and interpretable classification of central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and facet arthropathy from lumbar spine MRI.
methodsT2-weighted axial MRI studies of the lumbar spine acquired between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively selected (n = 200) and graded for central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and facet arthropathy. Studies were partitioned into patient-level train (n = 150), validation (n = 20), and test (n = 30) splits. V-Net models were first trained to segment the dural sac and the intervertebral disk, and localize facet and foramen using geometric rules. Subsequently, Big Transfer (BiT) models were trained for downstream classification tasks. An interpretable model for central canal stenosis was also trained using a decision tree classifier. Evaluation metrics included linearly weighted Cohen's kappa score for multi-grade classification and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for binarized classification.
resultsSegmentation of the dural sac and intervertebral disk achieved Dice scores of 0.93 and 0.94. Localization of foramen and facet achieved intersection over union of 0.72 and 0.83. Multi-class grading of central canal stenosis achieved a kappa score of 0.54. The interpretable decision tree classifier had a kappa score of 0.80. Pairwise agreement between readers (R1, R2), (R1, R3), and (R2, R3) was 0.86, 0.80, and 0.74. Binary classification of neural foraminal stenosis and facet arthropathy achieved AUROCs of 0.92 and 0.93.
conclusionDeep learning systems can be performant as well as interpretable for automated evaluation of lumbar spine MRI including classification of central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and facet arthropathy. KEY POINTS: • Interpretable deep-learning systems can be developed for the evaluation of clinical lumbar spine MRI. Multi-grade classification of central canal stenosis with a kappa of 0.80 was comparable to inter-reader agreement scores (0.74, 0.80, 0.86). Binary classification of neural foraminal stenosis and facet arthropathy achieved favorable and accurate AUROCs of 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. • While existing deep-learning systems are opaque, leading to clinical deployment challenges, the proposed system is accurate as well as interpretable, providing valuable information to a radiologist in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.