Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920518›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Metabolic tumour and nodal response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on FDG PET-CT as a predictor of pathological response and survival in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Jonathan L Moore, Manil Subesinghe, Aida Santaolalla, Michael Green, Harriet Deere, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Jesper Lagergren, Sugama Chicklore, Nick Maisey, James A Gossage and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Updated evidence on the accuracy ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan L MooreDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, East Wing Link Corridor, London, SE1 7EH, UK. Jonathan.moore13@nhs.net.
Manil SubesingheKing's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK.
Aida SantaolallaSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael GreenDepartment of Histopathology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Harriet DeereDepartment of Histopathology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Mieke Van HemelrijckSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jesper LagergrenDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, East Wing Link Corridor, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Sugama ChickloreKing's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK.
Nick MaiseyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
James A GossageDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, East Wing Link Corridor, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Mark KellyDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, East Wing Link Corridor, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Cara R BakerDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, East Wing Link Corridor, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Andrew R DaviesDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, East Wing Link Corridor, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Guy’s and St Thomas’ Oesophago-gastric Research Group
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives2-deoxy-2[

methodsCohort study of 75 patients with oesophageal or oesophago-gastric junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy then surgery at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (2017-2020). Standardised uptake value (SUV) metrics on pre- and post-treatment FDG PET-CT in the primary tumour (mTR) and loco-regional lymph nodes (mNR) were derived. Optimum SUV

resultsOptimum tumour SUV

conclusionsMetabolic tumour and nodal response predicted pTR and pNR, respectively, in patients with oesophageal or GOJ adenocarcinoma. However, currently utilised response criteria may not be optimal. pTR, mTR, pNR and mNR were independent predictors of survival. KEY POINTS: • FDG PET-CT has an emerging role in evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. • Prospective cohort study demonstrated that metabolic response in the primary tumour and lymph nodes was predictive of pathological response in a cohort of patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophago-gastric junction treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. • Patients who demonstrated a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the primary tumour or lymph nodes on FDG PET-CT demonstrated better survival and reduced rates of tumour recurrence.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsNeoadjuvant therapyOesophageal neoplasmsPathology, SurgicalPositron emission tomography-computed tomographySurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID36920518
PMCPMC10121512
OpenAlexW4324304693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.