Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920492›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2023

Single-center, prospective phase 2 trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with unilateral localized prostate cancer: good functional results but oncologically not as safe as expected.

Gregor Duwe, Katharina Boehm, Maximilian Haack, Peter Sparwasser, Maximilian Peter Brandt, Rene Mager, Igor Tsaur, Axel Haferkamp, Thomas Höfner

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregor DuweDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. gregor.duwe@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-1238
Katharina BoehmDepartment of Urology, Carl-Gustav-Carus University Medical Center, Dresden, Germany.
Maximilian HaackDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Peter SparwasserDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Maximilian Peter BrandtDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Rene MagerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Igor TsaurDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Axel HaferkampDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas HöfnerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFocal therapy (FT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is only recommended within the context of clinical trials by international guidelines. We aimed to investigate oncological follow-up and safety data of focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment.

methodsWe conducted a single-center prospective study of 29 patients with PCa treated with (focal) HIFU between 2016 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were unilateral PCa detected by mpMRI-US-fusion prostate biopsy and maximum prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 15 ng/ml. Follow-up included mpMRI-US fusion-re-biopsies 12 and 24 months after HIFU. No re-treatment of HIFU was allowed. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as freedom from intervention due to cancer progression.

resultsMedian follow-up of all patients was 23 months, median age was 67 years and median preoperative PSA was 6.8 ng/ml. One year after HIFU treatment PCa was still detected in 13/ 29 patients histologically (44.8%). Two years after HIFU another 7/29 patients (24.1%) were diagnosed with PCa. Until now, PCa recurrence was detected in 11/29 patients (37.93%) which represents an FFS rate of 62%.One patient developed local metastatic disease 2 years after focal HIFU. Adverse events (AE) were low with 70% of patients remaining with sufficient erectile function for intercourse and 97% reporting full maintenance of urinary continence.

conclusionHIFU treatment in carefully selected patients is feasible. However, HIFU was oncologically not as safe as expected because of progression rates of 37.93% and risk of progression towards metastatic disease. Thus, we stopped usage of HIFU in our department.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsUltrasound, High-Intensity Focused, TransrectalAgedHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstateProstate-Specific AntigenTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific AntigenFocal therapyHIFUHigh intensity focused ultrasoundProstate cancerUnilateral localized prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36920492
PMCPMC10188406
OpenAlexW4324303372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.