Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920449›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Evaluation of Two Web-Based Interventions (Res-Up! and REMOTION) in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy (Therapy Online Plus-TOP): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leonie Franziska Trimpop, Laura Luisa Bielinski, Thomas Berger, Ulrike Willutzki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04352010 (Therapy Online Plus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04352010 naunknown statusnot on this map

Therapy Online Plus (TOP+) - Comparing Two Online Interventions ("REMOTION" Resp. "Res-Up!") for Dealing With Challenging Life Circumstances

TypeinterventionalSponsorUlrike WillutzkiRan2020 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsMental Disorders, Online-InterventionArmsRes-Up!, REMOTION, Wait-Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonie Franziska TrimpopDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-4442
Laura Luisa BielinskiDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-6253
Thomas BergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-7791
Ulrike WillutzkiDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-4554
University of Bern · CHWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly 11%-40% of those with a mental disorder in Germany receive treatment. In many cases, face-to-face psychotherapy is not available because of limited resources, such as an insufficient number of therapists in the area. New approaches to improve the German health care system are needed to counter chronification. Web-based interventions have been shown to be effective as stand-alone and add-on treatments to routine practice. Interventions designed for a wide range of mental disorders such as transdiagnostic interventions are needed to make treatment for mental disorders more accessible and thus shorten waiting times and mitigate the chronification of mental health problems. In general, interventions can be differentiated as having either a capitalization (CAP) focus-thus drawing on already existing strengths-or a compensation (COMP) focus-trying to compensate for deficits. Up to now, the effectiveness of transdiagnostic web-based interventions with either a CAP or a COMP focus has not yet been evaluated.

objectiveThis study is the first to examine the effectiveness of two transdiagnostic web-based interventions: (1) the activation of resilience and drawing on existing strengths (CAP: Res-Up!) and (2) the improvement of emotion regulation (COMP: REMOTION), compared with care as usual (CAU) in routine outpatient psychotherapy.

methodsAdults with at least 1 mental health disorder will be recruited at 4 outpatient centers in Germany. Participants will then be randomized equally into 1 of the 2 intervention groups Res-Up! (CAP) and REMOTION (COMP) or into the control group (CAU). Assessments will be made at baseline (T0), at 6 weeks after treatment start (T1), and at 12 weeks after treatment start (T2). A primary outcome will be symptom severity (Brief Symptom Inventory-18). Secondary outcomes will focus on emotion regulation and resilience.

resultsParticipant recruitment and data collection started in April 2020 and were ongoing as of July 2022. We expect participants to benefit more from the interventions than from the CAU control on the dimensions of symptom severity, resilience, and emotion regulation. Furthermore, we expect to find possible differences between CAP and COMP. The results of the study are expected in 2023.

conclusionsThis randomized controlled trial will compare CAU with the transdiagnostic web-based interventions Res-Up! and REMOTION, and will thus inform future studies concerning the effectiveness of transdiagnostic web-based interventions in routine outpatient psychotherapy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04352010; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04352010. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/41413.

Indexed as

capitalizationcompensationeffectivenessemotion regulationGermanyinterventionmental disorderonline therapypsychotherapyrandomized controlled trialresiliencetransdiagnostictreatment

Identifiers

PMID36920449
PMCPMC10131645
OpenAlexW4313825150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.