Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36920329›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of experimental medicine2023

IFN-γ signature enables selection of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage III melanoma.

Irene L M Reijers, Disha Rao, Judith M Versluis, Alexander M Menzies, Petros Dimitriadis, Michel W Wouters, Andrew J Spillane, Willem M C Klop, Annegien Broeks, Linda J W Bosch and 16 more

Open access · hybridFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updated pan-tumor guidelines for neoadjuvant scoring of pathologic response: a joint SITC and INMC effort.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene L M Reijers *Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-3219
Disha Rao *Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9024-4759
Judith M VersluisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3423-9912
Alexander M MenziesMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5183-7562
Petros DimitriadisMolecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3546-285X
Michel W WoutersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6173-0662
Andrew J SpillaneMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8354-434X
Willem M C KlopDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-971X
Annegien BroeksCore Facility and Molecular Pathology & Biobanking department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8699-5058
Linda J W BoschPathology and Molecular Diagnostics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6323-9316
Marta Lopez-YurdaBiometrics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3678-3222
Winan J van HoudtDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2303-3468
Robert V RawsonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-4963
Lindsay G Grijpink-OngeringBiometrics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7708-4762
Maria GonzalezMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2197-6657
Sten CornelissenCore Facility and Molecular Pathology & Biobanking department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-6129
Jasper BouwmanPathology and Molecular Diagnostics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Joyce SandersCore Facility and Molecular Pathology & Biobanking department, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-7813
Elsemieke PlasmeijerDepartment of Dermatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-1930
Yannick S ElshotDepartment of Dermatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7148-2439
Richard A ScolyerMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8991-0013
Bart A van de WielDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-3308
Daniel S PeeperMolecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1293-3177
Alexander C J van AkkooiMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3262-6935
Georgina V LongMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-3545
Christian U BlankDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7945-5846
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Sydney · AULeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab has demonstrated high pathologic response rates in stage III melanoma. Patients with low intra-tumoral interferon-γ (IFN-γ) signatures are less likely to benefit. We show that domatinostat (a class I histone deacetylase inhibitor) addition to anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 increased the IFN-γ response and reduced tumor growth in our murine melanoma model, rationalizing evaluation in patients. To stratify patients into IFN-γ high and low cohorts, we developed a baseline IFN-γ signature expression algorithm, which was prospectively tested in the DONIMI trial. Patients with stage III melanoma and high intra-tumoral IFN-γ scores were randomized to neoadjuvant nivolumab or nivolumab + domatinostat, while patients with low IFN-γ scores received nivolumab + domatinostat or ipilimumab + nivolumab + domatinostat. Domatinostat addition to neoadjuvant nivolumab ± ipilimumab did not delay surgery but induced unexpected severe skin toxicity, hampering domatinostat dose escalation. At studied dose levels, domatinostat addition did not increase treatment efficacy. The baseline IFN-γ score adequately differentiated patients who were likely to benefit from nivolumab alone versus patients who require other therapies.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansInterferon-gammaIpilimumabMiceNeoadjuvant TherapyNivolumabBenzamidesdomatinostatInterferon-gammaIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID36920329
PMCPMC10037109
OpenAlexW4324307212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read364
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.