Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919870›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Aberrant Large-Scale Network Interactions Across Psychiatric Disorders Revealed by Large-Sample Multi-Site Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Datasets.

Takuya Ishida, Yuko Nakamura, Saori C Tanaka, Yuki Mitsuyama, Satoshi Yokoyama, Hotaka Shinzato, Eri Itai, Go Okada, Yuko Kobayashi, Takahiko Kawashima and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Takuya IshidaCenter for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko NakamuraCenter for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Saori C TanakaBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki MitsuyamaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Satoshi YokoyamaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hotaka ShinzatoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-1801
Eri ItaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Go OkadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-8513
Yuko KobayashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahiko KawashimaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun MiyataDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-1975
Yujiro YoshiharaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidehiko TakahashiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Susumu MoritaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shintaro KawakamiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Naohiro OkadaThe International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira KunimatsuDepartment of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumu YamashitaBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
Okito YamashitaBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroshi ImamizuBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-0051
Jun MorimotoBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
Yasumasa OkamotoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toshiya MuraiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kiyoto KasaiCenter for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuo KawatoBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
Shinsuke KoikeCenter for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3375-236X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisDynamics of the distributed sets of functionally synchronized brain regions, known as large-scale networks, are essential for the emotional state and cognitive processes. However, few studies were performed to elucidate the aberrant dynamics across the large-scale networks across multiple psychiatric disorders. In this paper, we aimed to investigate dynamic aspects of the aberrancy of the causal connections among the large-scale networks of the multiple psychiatric disorders. STUDY

designWe applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to the large-sample multi-site dataset with 739 participants from 4 imaging sites including 4 different groups, healthy controls, schizophrenia (SCZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BD), to compare the causal relationships among the large-scale networks, including visual network, somatomotor network (SMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), salience network (SAN), limbic network (LIN), frontoparietal network, and default mode network. STUDY

resultsDCM showed that the decreased self-inhibitory connection of LIN was the common aberrant connection pattern across psychiatry disorders. Furthermore, increased causal connections from LIN to multiple networks, aberrant self-inhibitory connections of DAN and SMN, and increased self-inhibitory connection of SAN were disorder-specific patterns for SCZ, MDD, and BD, respectively.

conclusionsDCM revealed that LIN was the core abnormal network common to psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, DCM showed disorder-specific abnormal patterns of causal connections across the 7 networks. Our findings suggested that aberrant dynamics among the large-scale networks could be a key biomarker for these transdiagnostic psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderMajor Depressive DisorderBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingbipolar disorderdynamic causal modelingmajor depressive disorderschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36919870
PMCPMC10318885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.