Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919757›Full record

ArticleCancer science2023

Molecular pathology quality control in Southeast Asia: Results of a multiregional quality assurance study from MASTER KEY Asia.

Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Hiroshi Yoshida, Yoshihisa Kobayashi, Motoko Arakaki, Chiharu Mizoguchi, Lina Inagaki, Pei Jye Voon, Adam Malik Bin Ismail, Hwoei Fen Soo Hoo, Suhana Yusak and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Combination ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Hitomi Sumiyoshi OkumaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-7361
Hiroshi YoshidaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-7813
Yoshihisa KobayashiDivision of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoko ArakakiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiharu MizoguchiDepartment of International Clinical Development, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Lina InagakiDepartment of International Clinical Development, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Pei Jye VoonDepartment of Radiotherapy, Oncology and Palliative Care, Hospital Umum Sarawak (Sarawak General Hospital), Kuching, Malaysia.
Adam Malik Bin IsmailDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Umum Sarawak (Sarawak General Hospital), Kuching, Malaysia.
Hwoei Fen Soo HooConsultant Clinical Oncologist and Training Lead, Penang General Hospital, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Suhana YusakDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Marcelo Severino B ImasaCancer Institute, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Thinh Nguyen HuyPathology Department, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tu Thai AnhPathology Department, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Shinji KohsakaDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-6136
Hiroyuki ManoDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-0181
Kan YonemoriDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-7611
Kenichi NakamuraDepartment of International Clinical Development, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi YatabeDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-559X
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPHCMC Hospital of Dermato Venereology · VNJapan Clinical Cancer Research Organization · JPSarawak General Hospital · MYTokyo National Hospital · JPDepartment of Statistics Malaysia · MYHospital Pulau Pinang · MYSt. Luke's Medical Center · PH

Funding

Daichi Sankyo Company, LtdEisai Co., LtdJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development 20lk0201002j0001National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 2021-A-5Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue specimen quality assurance is a major issue of precision medicine for rare cancers. However, the laboratory standards and quality of pathological specimens prepared in Asian hospitals remain unknown. To understand the methods in Southeast Asian oncology hospitals and to clarify how pre-analytics affect the quality of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, a questionnaire surveying pre-analytical procedures (Part I) was administered, quality assessment of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and DNA/RNA extracted from the representative FFPE specimens from each hospital (Part II) was conducted, and the quality of DNA/RNA extracted from FFPE of rare-cancer patients for genomic sequencing (Part III) was examined. Quality measurements for DNA/RNA included ΔΔCt, DV200, and cDNA yield. Six major cancer hospitals from Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam participated. One hospital showed unacceptable quality for the DNA/RNA assessment, but improved by revising laboratory procedures. Only 57% (n = 73) of the 128 rare-cancer patients' specimens met both DNA and RNA quality criteria for next-generation sequencing. Median DV200 was 80.7% and 64.3% for qualified and failed RNA, respectively. Median ΔΔCt was 1.25 for qualified and 4.89 for failed DNA. Longer storage period was significantly associated with poor DNA (fail to qualify ratio = 1579:321 days, p < 0.001) and RNA (fail to qualify ratio = 1070:280 days, p < 0.001). After improvement of pre-analytical factors, the qualification rate increased for hospitals A and E from 41.5% to 70.5% and 62.5% to 86%, respectively. This is the first report to elucidate the pre-analytical laboratory procedures of main Southeast Asian oncology hospitals. An external quality assessment program may improve factors associated with tumor FFPE specimen quality.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPathology, MolecularAsiaAsia, SoutheasternDNAHumansParaffin EmbeddingQuality ControlRNATissue FixationDNARNAAsian networkFFPE specimengenomic medicinemolecular diagnosismultiregional clinical researchquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID36919757
PMCPMC10236618
OpenAlexW4324311344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.