Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919616›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2023

Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Dynamics as a Bedside Test in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury to Assess Surgical Spinal Cord Decompression: Safety, Feasibility, and Proof-of-Concept.

Najmeh Kheram, Andrea Boraschi, Nikolai Pfender, Susanne Friedl, Maria Rasenack, Benjamin Fritz, Vartan Kurtcuoglu, Martin Schubert, Armin Curt, Carl M Zipser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Najmeh KheramSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea BoraschiInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nikolai PfenderSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Susanne FriedlSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maria RasenackSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Benjamin FritzDepartment of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vartan KurtcuogluInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin SchubertSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Armin CurtSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carl M ZipserSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4396-4796
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSufficient and timely spinal cord decompression is a critical surgical objective for neurological recovery in spinal cord injury (SCI). Residual cord compression may be associated with disturbed cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) dynamics.

objectivesThis study aims to assess whether intrathecal CSFP dynamics in SCI following surgical decompression are feasible and safe, and to explore the diagnostic utility.

methodsProspective cohort study. Bedside lumbar CSFP dynamics and cervical MRI were obtained following surgical decompression in N = 9 with mostly cervical acute-subacute SCI and N = 2 patients with non-traumatic SCI. CSFP measurements included mean CSFP, cardiac-driven CSFP peak-to-valley amplitudes (CSFPp), Valsalva maneuver, and Queckenstedt's test (firm pressure on jugular veins, QT). From QT, proxies for cerebrospinal fluid pulsatility curve were calculated (ie, relative pulse pressure coefficient; RPPC-Q). CSFP metrics were compared to spine-healthy patients. computer tomography (CT)-myelography was done in 3/8 simultaneous to CSFP measurements.

resultsMean age was 45 ± 9 years (range 17-67; 3F), SCI was complete (AIS A, N = 5) or incomplete (AIS B-D, N = 6). No adverse events related to CSFP assessments. CSFP rise during QT was induced in all patients [range 9.6-26.6 mmHg]. However, CSFPp was reduced in 3/11 (0.1-0.3 mmHg), and in 3/11 RPPC-Q was abnormal (0.01-0.05). Valsalva response was reduced in 8/11 (2.6-23.4 mmHg). CSFP dynamics corresponded to CT-myelography.

conclusionsComprehensive bedside lumbar CSFP dynamics in SCI following decompression are safe, feasible, and can reveal distinct patterns of residual spinal cord compression. Longitudinal studies are required to define critical thresholds of impaired CSFP dynamics that may impact neurological recovery and requiring surgical revisions.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid PressureSpinal Cord InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedDecompression, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSpinal CordYoung Adultcerebrospinal fluid pressurecompression biomarkercraniospinal compliancespinal cord compressionspinal cord injuryspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID36919616
PMCPMC10152574
OpenAlexW4324311211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.