Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919597›Full record

ReviewThe Gerontologist2024

Telecaregiving for Dementia: A Mapping Review of Technological and Nontechnological Interventions.

Jordan R Hill, Elissa E Min, Ephrem Abebe, Richard J Holden

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan R HillDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-9465
Elissa E MinDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2284-2033
Ephrem AbebeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Richard J HoldenDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Regenstrief Institute · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Brain Safe: Consumer Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Drugs Linked to Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG056926 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOLDEN, RICHARD J · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
A Systems Approach to Improve Safe Medication Management for Children with Medical ComplexityK01MD016167 · NIMHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI ABEBE, EPHREM · 2022 to 2025
$510k
NCATS NIH HHS K01MD016167NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIA NIH HHS KL22TR002530NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056926NIH HHS R01AG056926NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD016167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesInformal (or family) caregivers to older adults with Alzheimer's disease or other related dementias (ADRD) could greatly benefit from innovative telecaregiving systems that support caregiving from a distance. The objective of this review is to better understand (a) who is involved in telecaregiving and their experiences; (b) the interventions currently available to support ADRD telecaregiving; and (c) the outcomes measured to assess the effects of ADRD telecaregiving interventions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA mapping review was conducted by systematically searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO for all works published in English from 2002 to 2022. References of included publications were searched to identify additional empirical publications for inclusion.

resultsSixty-one publications (describing 48 studies and 5 nonstudy sources) were included in the review. Currently available information on the demographics, experiences, challenges, and benefits of ADRD telecaregivers is summarized. We found that interventions to support telecaregiving could be classified into 7 categories of technological interventions and 3 categories of nontechnological interventions. Empirical studies on ADRD telecaregiving interventions investigated a variety of outcomes, the most prevalent being user experience. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We conclude that (a) the paucity of literature on telecaregiving does not allow for a comprehensive understanding of the needs and day-to-day activities of ADRD telecaregivers; (b) interventions developed to support ADRD telecaregiving may not fully meet the needs of caregivers or care recipients; and (c) there is insufficient rigorous research establishing the effects of telecaregiving interventions on key ADRD-related outcomes.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAgedCaregiversHumansAging in placeInformal caregivingLong-distance caregivingRemote caregivingTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36919597
PMCPMC10733214
OpenAlexW4324303356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.