Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919556›Full record

SynthesisMedical education online2023

Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review.

Tracey A H Taylor, Kyeorda Kemp, Misa Mi, Sarah Lerchenfeldt

Full text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Relationship Between Inspirational Teaching and Self-Directed Learning in Health Professions Students-A Mixed-Method Study.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Self Directed Learning: A More Impactful Tool for Learning Tracheostomy by Medical Undergraduate?!Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tracey A H TaylorDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4739-7127
Kyeorda KempDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-393X
Misa MiMedical Library, Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Sarah LerchenfeldtDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1383-4456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this systematic review was to examine self-directed learning (SDL) assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education.

methodsSeven electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to retrieve English-language articles published between 2015 and July of 2022, investigating assessment of SDL learning outcomes. Extracted data included the sample size, field of study, study design, SDL activity type, SDL assessment method, number of SDL assessments used, study quality, number of SDL components present utilising the framework the authors developed, and SDL activity outcomes. We also assessed relationships between SDL assessment method and number of SDL components, study quality, field of study, and study outcomes.

resultsOf the 141 studies included, the majority of study participants were medical (51.8%) or nursing (34.8%) students. The most common SDL assessment method used was internally-developed perception surveys (49.6%). When evaluating outcomes for SDL activities, most studies reported a positive or mixed/neutral outcome (58.2% and 34.8%, respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between both number and type of assessments used, and study quality, with knowledge assessments (median-IQR 11.5) being associated with higher study quality (

conclusionsThe results of our systematic review suggest that SDL assessment practices within undergraduate health professions education vary greatly, as different aspects of SDL were leveraged and implemented by diverse groups of learners to meet different learning needs and professional accreditation requirements. Evidence-based best practices for the assessment of SDL across undergraduate healthcare professions education should include the use of multiple assessments, with direct and indirect measures, to more accurately assess student performance.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsSelf-Directed Learning as TopicStudents, Health OccupationsHumansLearningMotivationProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalStudents, Nursingassessmenthealth profession educationmedical studentsnursing studentsprogram evaluationSelf-directed learning

Identifiers

PMID36919556
PMCPMC10026772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read152
measurements read34
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.