Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919445›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2023

Implementing Social Risk Screening and Referral to Resources in the NICU.

Erika G Cordova-Ramos, Chandni Jain, Vanessa Torrice, Maggie McGean, Pablo Buitron de la Vega, Judith Burke, Donna Stickney, Robert J Vinci, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Margaret G Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of systematic screening for social determinants of health in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Associations between food insecurity and low birth weight severity in a national sample.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Implementing a Social Needs Screening and Referral Program for Obstetrics and Gynecology Patients.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erika G Cordova-RamosDepartments of Pediatrics.
Chandni JainGeneral Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vanessa TorriceGeneral Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maggie McGeanGeneral Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pablo Buitron de la VegaGeneral Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Judith BurkeDepartments of Pediatrics.
Donna StickneyDepartments of Pediatrics.
Robert J VinciDepartments of Pediatrics.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniEvans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences (CIIS).
Margaret G ParkerDepartment of Pediatrics, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Funding

Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR001411 · NCATS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MORONE, NATALIA E. · 2015 to 2024
$5.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocial risk screening is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, but this practice is underutilized in NICUs. To address this gap in social care, we aimed to increase rates of: (1) systematic social risk screening and (2) connection with community resources, each to ≥50% over a 14-month period.

methodsWe conducted a quality improvement initiative from November 2020 to January 2022. We adapted a screening tool and used Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to integrate screening and referral to resources into clinical workflow. Primary outcome measures included the percentage of (1) families screened and (2) connection with resources. We examined screening by maternal race/ethnicity and primary language. Process measures were (1) time from admission to screening and (2) percentage of referrals provided to families reporting unmet needs and requesting assistance. We used statistical process control to assess change over time and χ2 tests to compare screening by race/ethnicity and language.

resultsThe rates of systematic screening increased from 0% to 49%. Among 103 families screened, 84% had ≥1, and 64% had ≥2 unmet needs, with a total of 221 needs reported. Education, employment, transportation, and food were the most common needs. Screening rates did not vary by race/ethnicity or language. Among families requesting assistance, 98% received referrals. The iterative improvement of a written resource guide and community partnerships led to increased rates of connection with resources from 21% to 52%.

conclusionLeveraging existing staff, our social risk screening and referral intervention built the capacity to address the high burden of unmet needs among NICU families.

Indexed as

FamilyIntensive Care Units, NeonatalChildHumansInfant, NewbornMass ScreeningReferral and ConsultationSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID36919445
PMCPMC10797529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.