ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023
Bayesian order constrained adaptive design for phase II clinical trials evaluating subgroup-specific treatment effect.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Adaptive Biomarker-based Umbrella Trial Design Using Bayesian Latent Class Model.Statistics in biopharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Adaptive Marker-Stratified Design for Phase II Clinical Trials Using Calibrated Spike-and-Slab priors.Statistics in biopharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- A Bayesian adaptive biomarker stratified phase II randomized clinical trial design for radiotherapies with competing risk survival outcomes.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "one-size-fits-all'' paradigm is inappropriate for phase II clinical trials evaluating biotherapies, which are often expected to have substantial heterogeneous treatment effects among different subgroups defined by biomarker. For these biotherapies, the objective of phase II clinical trials is often to evaluate subgroup-specific treatment effects. In this article, we propose a simple yet efficient Bayesian adaptive phase II biomarker-guided design, referred to as the Bayesian-order constrained adaptive design, to detect the subgroup-specific treatment effects of biotherapies. The Bayesian order constrained adaptive design combines the features of the enrichment design and sequential design. It starts with a "all-comers" stage, and subsequently switches to an enrichment stage for either the marker-positive subgroup or marker-negative subgroup, depending on the interim analysis results. The go/no go enrichment criteria are determined by two posterior probabilities utilizing the inherent ordering constraint between two subgroups. We also extend the Bayesian-order constrained adaptive design to handle the missing biomarker situation. We conducted comprehensive computer simulation studies to investigate the operating characteristics of the Bayesian order constrained adaptive design, and compared it with other existing and conventional designs. The results shown that the Bayesian order constrained adaptive design yielded the best overall performance in detecting the subgroup-specific treatment effects by jointly considering the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the trials. The software for simulation and trial implementation are available for free download.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.