Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919340›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2023

Psychosocial and behavioural interventions for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a systematic review of efficacy meta-analyses.

Matteo Cella, Safina Roberts, Matthias Pillny, Marcel Riehle, Brian O'Donoghue, John Lyne, Paul Tomlin, Lucia Valmaggia, Antonio Preti

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Matteo CellaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and the Maudsley NHS Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5701-0336
Safina RobertsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and the Maudsley NHS Trust, UK.
Matthias PillnyClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute for Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2395-8433
Marcel RiehleClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute for Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Germany.
Brian O'DonoghueDepartment of Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Ireland; and Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
John LyneRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland; and Health Service Executive, Newcastle Hospital, Ireland.
Paul TomlinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Lucia ValmaggiaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; South London and the Maudsley NHS Trust, UK; and Katholieke Leuven Universitet, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-8464
Antonio PretiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy.
King's College London · GBUniversität Hamburg · DERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently there is no first-line treatment recommended for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Psychosocial and behavioural interventions are widely used to reduce the burden of negative symptoms. Meta-analytic studies have summarised the evidence for specific approaches but not compared evidence quality and benefit.

aimTo review and evaluate the evidence from meta-analytic studies of psychosocial and behavioural interventions for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

methodA systematic literature search was undertaken to identify all meta-analyses evaluating psychosocial and behavioural interventions reporting on negative symptom outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Data on intervention, study characteristics, acceptability and outcome were extracted. Risk of bias was evaluated. Results were summarised descriptively, and evidence ranked on methodological quality.

resultsIn total, 31 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria evaluating the efficacy of negative symptom interventions on 33 141 participants. Exercise interventions showed effect sizes (reduction in negative symptoms) ranging from -0.59 to -0.24 and psychological interventions ranging from -0.65 to -0.04. Attrition ranged between 12% to 32%. Across the studies considered heterogeneity varied substantially (range 0-100). Most of the reviews were of very low to low methodological quality. Methodological quality ranking suggested that the effect size for cognitive remediation and exercise therapy may be more robust compared with other approaches.

conclusionsMost of the interventions considered had a small-to-moderate effect size, good acceptability levels but very few had negative symptoms as the primary intervention target. To improve the confidence of these effect sizes being replicated in clinical settings future studies should minimise risk of bias.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySchizophreniaBehavior TherapyHumansPsychosocial Interventionnegative symptomsPsychosispsychosocialreviewschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36919340
PMCPMC10331321
OpenAlexW4324311202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.