Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919264›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2023

Hospital-based higher calorie refeeding and mealtime distress in adolescents and young adults with anorexia nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa.

Erin C Accurso, Jing Cheng, Vanessa I Machen, Sara Buckelew, Anna Kreiter, Sally Adams, Daniel Le Grange, Neville H Golden, Andrea K Garber

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. High-Caloric Realimentation and Mental and Physical Well-Being in Patients With Extreme Anorexia Nervosa. A Prospective Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Mealtime Physiological Responses in Individuals With Eating Disorders and Healthy Controls.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin C AccursoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5521-6381
Jing ChengDepartment of Preventive & Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Vanessa I MachenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sara BuckelewDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anna KreiterDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Sally AdamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Daniel Le GrangeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-9496
Neville H GoldenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2262-6955
Andrea K GarberDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTIAN VAISSE · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Refeeding in Anorexia NervosaR01HD082166 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GARBER, ANDREA K · 2015 to 2025
$5.7M
Adapting and Implementing Family-Based Treatment for Youth with Anorexia Nervosa in Publicly-Funded SettingsK23MH120347 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ACCURSO, ERIN CECILIA · 2019 to 2023
$846k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082166NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK098722NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH120347NIMH NIH HHS K23MH120347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe StRONG study demonstrated that higher calorie refeeding (HCR) restored medical stability faster in patients hospitalized with anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN (AAN), with no increased safety events compared with standard-of-care lower calorie refeeding (LCR). However, some clinicians have expressed concern about potential unintended consequences of HCR (e.g., greater mealtime distress). The purpose of this study was to examine patient treatment preference and compare mealtime distress, food refusal, and affective states between treatments.

methodParticipants (N = 111) in this multisite randomized clinical trial were ages 12-24 years, with AN or AAN, admitted to hospital with medical instability who received assigned study treatment (HCR or LCR). Treatment preference was assessed prior to randomization in the full sample. In a subset of participants (n = 45), linear mixed effect models were used to analyze momentary ratings of mealtime distress (pre, during, and post-meals) and daily affective state during the hospitalization.

resultsAbout half (55%) of participants reported a preference for LCR. Treatment assignment was not associated with food refusal, mealtime distress, or affective states in the subsample. Food refusal increased significantly over the course of refeeding (p = .018). Individuals with greater depression experienced more negative affect (p = .033), with worsening negative affect over time for individuals with higher eating disorder psychopathology (p = .023). DISCUSSION: Despite understandable concerns about potential unintended consequences of HCR, we found no evidence that treatment acceptability for HCR differed from LCR for adolescents and young adults with AN and AAN. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: The efficacy and safety of higher calorie refeeding in hospitalized patients with anorexia nervosa has been demonstrated. However, it is not known whether higher calorie refeeding (HCR) increases meal-time distress. This study demonstrated that HCR was not associated with increased mealtime distress, food refusal, or affective states, as compared with lower calorie refeeding. These data support HCR treatment acceptability for adolescents/young adults with anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaAdolescentEnergy IntakeHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMealsYoung Adultanorexia nervosaatypical anorexia nervosafood refusalhigh caloriemealtime distressmedical stabilizationnegative affectpositive affectrefeedingtreatment acceptability

Identifiers

PMID36919264
PMCPMC10247438
OpenAlexW4324311309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.