ArticlePeerJ2023
Analysis of
Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Up-to-date MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of theJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- A large number of variants ofPeerJ · 2026Article
- Quinolone Resistance and Zoonotic Potential ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Human Infections by Novel Zoonotic Species Corynebacterium silvaticum, Germany.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Genomic insights into plasmid mediated AMR genes, virulence factors and mobile genetic elements in raw milk Escherichia coli from Gujarat, India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Virulence and mutations analysis based on the whole genome of a BrazilianFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Infection by a multidrug-resistant Corynebacterium diphtheriae strain: prediction of virulence factors, CRISPR-Cas system analysis, and structural implications of mutations conferring rifampin resistance.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Article
- Proteomics of Toxigenic Corynebacteria.Proteomes · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: To further investigate the species genetic diversity and probable production of DT by Portuguese strains, eight isolates from this country were sequenced and compared to 38 public ones. Results: Strains from Portugal are monophyletic, nearly identical, form a unique cluster and have 27 out of 36 known
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.