ArticleEplasty2023
Potent Micrografting Using the Meek Technique for Knee Joint Wound Reconstruction.
Article in Eplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review of Computational and Experimental Studies on Skin Mechanics and Meshing: Discrepancies, Challenges, and Optimization Strategies.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature.European burn journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efficient treatment of extensive skin defects by using skin grafting is a significant challenge because the skin available to use is limited. A mesh graft is usually used; however, the expansion ratio is small (up to 1:6) and inaccurate. The Meek technique is a method of skin grafting that processes the skin into micrografts by cutting. The advantage of the Meek technique is its efficient use of available skin, expanding its area by up to 9 times. In 2020, Japanese insurance companies began to cover treatment using the Meek technique. This report aimed to show the usefulness of the Meek technique for treating left leg necrotizing fasciitis. Methods: A 55-year-old male was referred to our hospital for treating necrotizing fasciitis of the left leg. Debridement was performed, and antibiotics were administered immediately. After 1 month, Meek micrografts were applied to the left knee wound. The expansion ratio of the Meek micrografts was 1:9. Results: The skin was processed 9 times using the Meek technique, enabling effective use of a small amount of skin. Epithelialization of the Meek micrograft area was completed 1 month after skin grafting. The scar after Meek micrografting was soft and not reddish. The range of motion of the knee joint was >90 degrees. Conclusions: The Meek technique allows expansion of limited skin efficiently. Meek micrografts can cover a larger wound with smaller skin grafts than is possible with mesh grafts. After healing with Meek micrografts, the scar was soft, and the knee joint flexed smoothly. The Meek technique is useful for treating large wounds requiring skin grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36919156PMC10008300W4324305914What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.