Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36919086›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

COVID-19 chest X-ray image analysis by threshold-based segmentation.

Walid Al-Zyoud, Dana Erekat, Rama Saraiji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Walid Al-ZyoudDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Applied Medical Sciences, German Jordanian University, 11180 Amman Jordan.
Dana ErekatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Applied Medical Sciences, German Jordanian University, 11180 Amman Jordan.
Rama SaraijiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Applied Medical Sciences, German Jordanian University, 11180 Amman Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is a severe acute respiratory syndrome that has caused a major ongoing pandemic worldwide. Imaging systems such as conventional chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) were proven essential for patients due to the lack of information about the complications that could result from this disease. In this study, the aim was to develop and evaluate a method for automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 using binary segmentation of chest X-ray images. The study used frontal chest X-ray images of 27 infected and 19 uninfected individuals from Kaggle COVID-19 Radiography Database, and applied binary segmentation and quartering in MATLAB to analyze the images. The binary images of the lung were split into four quarters; Q1 = right upper quarter, Q2 = left upper quarter, Q3 = right lower, and Q4 = left lower. The results showed that COVID-19 patients had a higher percentage of attenuation in the lower lobes of the lungs (p-value < 0.00001) compared to healthy individuals, which is likely due to ground-glass opacities and consolidations caused by the infection. The ratios of white pixels in the four quarters of the X-ray images were calculated, and it was found that the left lower quarter had the highest number of white pixels but without a statistical significance compared to right lower quarter (p-value = 0.102792). This supports the theory that COVID-19 primarily affects the lower and lateral fields of the lungs, and suggests that the virus is accumulated mostly in the lower left quarter of the lungs. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on the respiratory system and can help in the development of accurate diagnostic methods.

Indexed as

Binary segmentationCOVID-19Ground-glass opacitiesX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36919086
PMCPMC9998128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.