ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023
Morphological Macular Changes Under Brolucizumab Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Refractory to Previous Anti-VEGF Treatment Compared with Treatment-Naive Eyes.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with and without Retinal Pigment Epithelial Detachment: A Real-World Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the morphological macular changes and fluid dynamics under brolucizumab treatment in eyes refractory to previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) compared with treatment-naive eyes. Methods: Retrospective study of all eyes treated with brolucizumab for nAMD between 2020 and 2021 with a fixed injection regimen and one year follow-up. Treatment-naive eyes (TN) were compared with eyes refractory to previous treatment with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept (RT). The primary outcome measure was change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcome measures included foveal central thickness (FCT), presence of intra- or subretinal fluid (IRF, SRF) and presence of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) at any time point during treatment in both groups. Results: Seventeen TN eyes and 17 RT eyes were included. Mean BCVA and mean FCT in TN eyes had significantly improved after 3 months and continued to improve during treatment (p<0.05 and p=0.001, respectively). In RT eyes, mean BCVA did not change significantly while mean FCT had improved after 3 months of treatment and remained stable thereafter. SRF or PED were more frequent in RT eyes compared with TN eyes (p=0.003 and p=0.005, respectively). Conclusion: After 3 months of treatment, the BCVA increased significantly only in TN eyes, while the FCT was significantly reduced in both groups. IRF appears to be similarly seen in both groups after the loading phase; however, SRF and PED appear to be more frequent in the RT eyes compared with TN eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.