Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918907›Full record

ArticleBioPsychoSocial medicine2023

Individualized peer support needs assessment for families with eating disorders.

Chisato Ohara, Aya Nishizono-Maher, Atsushi Sekiguchi, Ayako Sugawara, Yuriko Morino, Junko Kawakami, Mari Hotta

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BioPsychoSocial medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chisato OharaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Bunkyo University, 3337 Minami-Ogishima, Koshigaya-Shi, Saitama, 343-8511, Japan. c-ohara@bunkyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-2210
Aya Nishizono-MaherFaculty of Psychology, Meiji Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi SekiguchiDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayako SugawaraDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuriko MorinoNarimasu Kosei Hospital, Narimasu Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko KawakamiTokyo Metropolitan Schools, Tokyo, Japan.
Mari HottaAtomi University, Faculty of Psychology, Tokyo, Japan.
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPAtomi University · JPBunkyo University · JPMeiji Gakuin University · JPNerima General Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan University · JP

Funding

AMED under Grant JP20dk0307095JSPS KAKENHI Grant JP19K14436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer support among family members is important in cases of mental illness, but there has been limited practice or research on individual peer support specific to families taking care of patients with eating disorders (EDs). To conduct peer support activities, it is necessary to clarify the needs of families.

objectivesThe objective of this study are to identify the needs for group and individual peer support and the characteristics of family members with EDs who are willing to receive and provide individual peer support.

methodA cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted for family members with EDs recruited via the Internet. The questionnaires included demographic information on respondents and their patients, questions about the need for family peer support, interest in offering peer support, and social resources. All participants were given the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8), and the Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale (ABOS).

resultsOut of 314 respondents, 87.3% believed that a group peer support system was necessary, whereas 56.7% believed that an individual peer support system was necessary. As to whether they want to use individual peer support, 70 (22.4%) stated "Extremely YES" and 99 (31.7%) stated "Moderately YES." Family members who were willing to receive individual peer support used more social resources and had higher scores on the GHQ and J-ZBI_8. Regarding the provision of peer support, 38 (12.2%) responded "very interested and willing to provide it if possible" and 87 (27.9%) responded "interested and willing to study." Those with a high willingness to provide peer support used more social resources and had lower ABOS scores; however, 38 respondents (45.7%) exceeded the GHQ mental health screening cutoff (3/4).

conclusionFamily members with ED had a strong need for family peer support Those willing to receive individual peer support suffered from poor mental health and high burden of care. Family members willing to provide peer support tended to have patients whose EDs symptoms had already improved, but their own mental health was not necessarily good. Training for potential peer supporters is needed to implement peer support.

Indexed as

Caregiver burdenEating disordersFamilyPeer support

Identifiers

PMID36918907
PMCPMC10012548
OpenAlexW4324142783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read105
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.