Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918856›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Digital health in musculoskeletal care: where are we heading?

Latika Gupta, Aurélie Najm, Koroush Kabir, Diederik De Cock

Full text readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Digital Approaches for Myositis.Current rheumatology reports · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Latika GuptaDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Aurélie NajmInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Sir Graeme Davies Building Level 4, Glasgow, UK.
Koroush KabirDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Diederik De CockBiostatistics and Medical Informatics Research Group, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. diederik.de.cock@vub.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders launched a Collection on digital health to get a sense of where the wind is blowing, and what impact these technologies are and will have on musculoskeletal medicine. This editorial summarizes findings and focuses on some key topics, which are valuable as digital health establishes itself in patient care. Elements discussed are digital tools for the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, coupled together with advances in methodologies to analyse health records and imaging. Moreover, the acceptability and validity of these digital advances is discussed. In sum, this editorial and the papers presented in this article collection on Digital health in musculoskeletal care will give the interested reader both a glance towards which future we are heading, and which new challenges these advances bring.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesTelemedicineHumansArtificial intelligenceDigital healtheHealthMusculoskeletalOrthopedicsRheumatologyTelemedicineVirtual consultation

Identifiers

PMID36918856
PMCPMC10012296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.