ReviewBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
What is manipulation? A new definition.
Review in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge and use of thoracic manipulations by manual therapists in Belgium and the Netherlands.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2026Article
- Genetic counseling in veterinary medicine: towards an evidence-based definition for the small animal practice.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Integrated manual therapies: IASP taskforce viewpoint.Pain reports · 2024Article
- Hip Manipulation Increases Electromyography Amplitude and Hip Joint Performance: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A novel model for developing thrust joint manipulation skills: a teaching and learning perspective.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2024Article
- Profession-based manual therapy nomenclature: exploring history, limitations, and opportunities.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDefinitions are important in healthcare. Unfortunately, problems can be found withall existing definitions of manipulation.
methodsThis paper derives a set of eligibility criteria from prior definitions of manipulation to inform what should (and should not) be incorporated within a valid definition. These criteria were then used to select components from currently available empirical data to create a new definition.
resultsThe resulting definition of manipulation is: "Separation (gapping) of opposing articular surfaces of a synovial joint, caused by a force applied perpendicularly to those articular surfaces, that results in cavitation within the synovial fluid of that joint." The corresponding definition for the mechanical response of a manipulation is: "Separation (gapping) of opposing articular surfaces of a synovial joint that results in cavitation within the synovial fluid of that joint." In turn, the action of a manipulation can be defined as: "A force applied perpendicularly to the articular surfaces."
conclusionsWe believe these definitions to be valid (derived from and consistent with all available empirical data), complete (containing all necessary components), minimally sufficient (minimal redundancy, and sufficient to distinguish manipulation from other physical interventions), and robust (able to withstand important limitations embodied within sensible eligibility criteria). It is hoped that the simplicity and clarity of these definitions, and the transparency of their formation, will encourage their wide adoption in clinical, research, educational and professional settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.