Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918735›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2023

Multivariable prediction model for both 90-day mortality and long-term survival for individual patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: does the predicted survival justify the surgical risk?

Anne-Marleen van Keulen, Stefan Buettner, Joris I Erdmann, Johann Pratschke, Francesca Ratti, William R Jarnagin, Andreas A Schnitzbauer, Hauke Lang, Andrea Ruzzenente, Silvio Nadalin and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Anne-Marleen van KeulenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-483X
Stefan BuettnerDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-127X
Joris I ErdmannDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8233-1505
Johann PratschkeDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Francesca RattiDivision of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8108-9064
William R JarnaginDepartment of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andreas A SchnitzbauerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hauke LangDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andrea RuzzenenteDepartment of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6911-563X
Silvio NadalinDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Matteo CesconGeneral Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Baki TopalDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pim B OlthofDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-6973
perihilar cholangiocarcinoma collaboration group
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKU Leuven · BEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Verona · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of death after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is high; nearly one in every five patients dies within 90 days after surgery. When the oncological benefit is limited, a high-risk resection may not be justified. This retrospective cohort study aimed to create two preoperative prognostic models to predict 90-day mortality and overall survival (OS) after major liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

methodsSeparate models were built with factors known before surgery using multivariable regression analysis for 90-day mortality and OS. Patients were categorized in three groups: favourable profile for surgical resection (90-day mortality rate below 10 per cent and predicted OS more than 3 years), unfavourable profile (90-day mortality rate above 25 per cent and/or predicted OS below 1.5 years), and an intermediate group.

resultsA total of 1673 patients were included. Independent risk factors for both 90-day mortality and OS included ASA grade III-IV, large tumour diameter, and right-sided hepatectomy. Additional risk factors for 90-day mortality were advanced age and preoperative cholangitis; those for long-term OS were high BMI, preoperative jaundice, Bismuth IV, and hepatic artery involvement. In total, 294 patients (17.6 per cent) had a favourable risk profile for surgery (90-day mortality rate 5.8 per cent and median OS 42 months), 271 patients (16.2 per cent) an unfavourable risk profile (90-day mortality rate 26.8 per cent and median OS 16 months), and 1108 patients (66.2 per cent) an intermediate risk profile (90-day mortality rate 12.5 per cent and median OS 27 months).

conclusionPreoperative risk models for 90-day mortality and OS can help identify patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who are unlikely to benefit from surgical resection. Tailored shared decision-making is particularly essential for the large intermediate group.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaKlatskin TumorBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36918735
PMCPMC10364519
OpenAlexW4324309241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.