Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918616›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

Community dynamics of microbial eukaryotes in intertidal mudflats in the hypertidal Bay of Fundy.

Eke I Kalu, Adrian Reyes-Prieto, Myriam A Barbeau

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eke I KaluDepartment of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada. ekalu1@unb.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-0409
Adrian Reyes-PrietoDepartment of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-6162
Myriam A BarbeauDepartment of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1123-4577
University of New Brunswick · CA

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2015-04825Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2018-04025Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2020-04106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protists (microbial eukaryotes) are a critically important but understudied group of microorganisms. They are ubiquitous, represent most of the genetic and functional diversity among eukaryotes, and play essential roles in nutrient and energy cycling. Yet, protists remain a black box in marine sedimentary ecosystems like the intertidal mudflats in the Bay of Fundy. The harsh conditions of the intertidal zone and high energy nature of tides in the Bay of Fundy provide an ideal system for gaining insights into the major food web players, diversity patterns and potential structuring influences of protist communities. Our 18S rDNA metabarcoding study quantified seasonal variations and vertical stratification of protist communities in Bay of Fundy mudflat sediments. Three 'SAR' lineages were consistently dominant (in terms of abundance, richness, and prevalence), drove overall community dynamics and formed the core microbiome in sediments. They are Cercozoa (specifically thecate, benthic gliding forms), Bacillariophyta (mainly cosmopolitan, typically planktonic diatoms), and Dinophyceae (dominated by a toxigenic, bloom-forming species). Consumers were the dominant trophic functional group and were comprised mostly of eukaryvorous and bacterivorous Cercozoa, and omnivorous Ciliophora, while phototrophs were dominated by Bacillariophyta. The codominance of Apicomplexa (invertebrate parasites) and Syndiniales (protist parasites) in parasite assemblages, coupled with broader diversity patterns, highlighted the combined marine and terrestrial influences on microbial communities inhabiting intertidal sediments. Our findings, the most comprehensive in a hypertidal benthic system, suggest that synergistic interactions of both local and regional processes (notably benthic-pelagic coupling) may drive heterogenous microbial distribution in high-energy coastal systems.

Identifiers

PMID36918616
PMCPMC10014957
OpenAlexW4324304737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read97
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.