Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918420›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2023

Effects of trunk neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the motor circuits of able-bodied individuals.

Atsushi Sasaki, Na Cao, Akiko Yuasa, Milos R Popovic, Kimitaka Nakazawa, Matija Milosevic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Atsushi SasakiGraduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan.
Na CaoDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Akiko YuasaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine I, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-Cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Milos R PopovicInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G9, Canada.
Kimitaka NakazawaDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan. nakazawa@idaten.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-8659
Matija MilosevicGraduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H04082Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18KK0272Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K23606Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K19412Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22J01084JST-Mirai Program JP20349063JST-MOONSHOT program JPMJMS2012-2-2-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper- and lower-limb neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is known to modulate the excitability of the neural motor circuits. However, it remains unclear whether short-duration trunk muscle NMES could achieve similar neuromodulation effects. We assessed motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited through transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex representation of the trunk extensor muscles to evaluate corticospinal excitability. Moreover, cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) were assessed through cervicomedullary junction magnetic stimulation to evaluate subcortical excitability. Twelve able-bodied individuals participated in the MEP study, and another twelve in the CMEP study. During the interventions, NMES was applied bilaterally to activate the erector spinae muscle and produce intermittent contractions (20 s ON/20 s OFF) for a total of 20 min while participants remained seated. Assessments were performed: (i) before; (ii) during (in brief periods when NMES was OFF); and (iii) immediately after the interventions to compare MEP or CMEP excitability. Our results showed that MEP responses were not affected by trunk NMES, while CMEP responses were facilitated for approximately 8 min during the intervention, and returned to baseline before the end of the 20 min stimulating period. Our findings therefore suggest that short-duration NMES of the trunk extensor muscles likely does not affect the corticospinal excitability, but it has a potential to facilitate subcortical neural circuits immediately after starting the intervention. These findings indicate that short-duration application of NEMS may be helpful in rehabilitation to enhance neuromodulation of the trunk subcortical neural motor circuits.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalPyramidal TractsElectric StimulationElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCorticospinal tractNeuromodulationNeuromuscular electrical stimulationTrunk

Identifiers

PMID36918420
PMCPMC10082097
OpenAlexW4324138106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.