ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Classification of aggressive B-cell lymphomas : News and open questions].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological and genetic analyses of thyroid large B-cell lymphoma in a Japanese population.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) show a broad consensus in the categorization of aggressive, large B‑cell lymphomas with expected minor impact only on the daily diagnostic routine. The changes compared to the 2017 revised WHO-HAEM4R are moderate and include updated names of entities, sharpened diagnostic criteria, and upgrades from provisional to definite entities. The definition of the most common aggressive B‑cell lymphoma, diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified (NOS), remains unchanged, and both classifications strongly encourage subtyping into germinal center B‑like (GCB) or the activated B‑like (ABC or non-GCB) DLBCL. DLBCL, NOS, should be separated from other large B‑cell lymphomas including large B‑cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement (upgraded to a definite entity in both classifications) and large-cell/high-grade B‑cell lymphomas with 11q aberration. Aggressive B‑cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements form a molecularly distinct group and are listed as definite entities in both classifications. This is in contrast to the more heterogeneous group of aggressive B‑cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements that are recognized as a provisional entity in the ICC, while they fall into the DLBCL, NOS, or the HGBL, NOS, groups in the WHO-HAEM5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.