Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918217›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Legislation on marketing of breast-milk substitutes in digital and social media: a scoping review.

Bianca Franco-Lares, Vania Lara-Mejía, Ana Lilia Lozada-Tequeanes, Cassandra Villanueva-Vázquez, Sonia Hernandez-Cordero

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bianca Franco-LaresResearch Center for Equitable Development EQUIDE, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
Vania Lara-MejíaResearch Center for Equitable Development EQUIDE, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
Ana Lilia Lozada-TequeanesResearch Center of Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Cassandra Villanueva-VázquezResearch Center for Equitable Development EQUIDE, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
Sonia Hernandez-CorderoResearch Center for Equitable Development EQUIDE, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico sonia.hernandez@ibero.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-0962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative and continuously changing methods of digital marketing are routinely used to reach young women and their families with advertisements that normalise infant artificial feeding and undermine breastfeeding. Legislation and provisions regulating digital and social media marketing are limited across countries. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically identify and summarise worldwide legislation implemented to regulate breast-milk substitutes (BMS) marketing on digital and social media, as well as identifying areas of opportunity to strengthen and improve it. Documents published from January 2012 to April 2022 were examined using search strategies including multiple databases and citation tracking. A total of 127 sources were evaluated, and only 28 documents from 24 countries meeting the inclusion criteria were retained. Most of the reviewed documents explicitly stated that digital marketing was prohibited (n=23), as opposed to being regulated only, with prior approval from the relevant authorities in each country. Regarding monitoring, from the countries included in this scoping review, only 14 of 24 (58.3%) stipulate a monitoring process for compliance with legal measures and have designated an actor responsible for monitoring. In addition, 22 of 24 (91.6%) countries included have defined sanctions, but only 17 (70%) countries specify the entity responsible for enforcement. The results highlight the urgent call for the explicit regulation of BMS marketing in digital and social media worldwide, as well as the public documentation of such legal measures. Likewise, it is important that there are effective, transparent and free of commercial influence national monitoring systems used to ensure compliance with legal measures.

Indexed as

Milk SubstitutesSocial MediaBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfantMarketingchild healthhealth policynutritionpublic healthreview

Identifiers

PMID36918217
PMCPMC10016289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.