ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2024
The Influence of the Partner's Involvement in Antenatal Genetic Group Counseling on Pregnant individuals' Scores on Tests of Vital Knowledge Relating to Pregnancy.
Article in American journal of perinatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePhysicians and other medical providers counsel patients to provide them with most important information and available medical service options. How to provide the most effective antenatal counseling is an important focus among experts. Our study focuses on the influence of the partner's involvement during antenatal genetic group counseling (AGGC). This study aimed to compare the ratio of pregnant individuals who have knowledge score improvement after AGGC, with a focus on pregnant individuals who attend counseling with/without their partner and to identify other possible factors that could influence the knowledge improvement. STUDY
designA prospective cohort study was conducted. Pregnant individuals were assessed for their knowledge by using a self-questionnaire prior to and immediately after AGGC.
resultsA total of 553 pregnant women were enrolled; 310 and 243 participants attended the AGGC without and with their partner, respectively. The ratio of the participants who increased their overall knowledge score was significantly higher after the AGGC for those who were with partner compared with those without. The medians (Q1-Q3) of the overall knowledge scores before and after the AGGC were 32 (29-36) and 36 (31-39) in the AGGC with their partner, respectively, and 33 (30-36) and 35 (32-39) in the AGGC without their partner, respectively. Knowledge of trisomy-21 screening of all participants got the lowest score and less improvement when compared with other topics.
conclusionPartner's involvement in the AGGC was associated with a higher ratio of the participants who increased their overall knowledge score when comparing the scores prior to and immediately after the AGGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.