Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36918138›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Measurement of Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations using OPM-MEG.

Natalie Rhodes, Molly Rea, Elena Boto, Lukas Rier, Vishal Shah, Ryan M Hill, James Osborne, Cody Doyle, Niall Holmes, Sebastian C Coleman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Anatomically Veridical On-Scalp Sensor Topographies.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Combining video telemetry and wearable MEG for naturalistic imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natalie RhodesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Molly ReaSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Elena BotoCerca Magnetics Ltd. 2, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Dr, Nottingham NG7 1LD; Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Lukas RierSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Vishal ShahQuSpin Inc. 331 South 104th Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA.
Ryan M HillSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; Cerca Magnetics Ltd. 2, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Dr, Nottingham NG7 1LD.
James OsborneQuSpin Inc. 331 South 104th Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA.
Cody DoyleQuSpin Inc. 331 South 104th Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA.
Niall HolmesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; Cerca Magnetics Ltd. 2, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Dr, Nottingham NG7 1LD.
Sebastian C ColemanSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Karen MullingerSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Richard BowtellSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; Cerca Magnetics Ltd. 2, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Dr, Nottingham NG7 1LD. Electronic address: matthew.brookes@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

High-resolution Non-cryogenic Magnetoencephalography: Systems-Level IntegrationR44MH110288 · NIMH · QUSPIN · PI SHAH, VISHAL K · 2016 to 2022
$5.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH110288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are an emerging lightweight and compact sensor that can measure magnetic fields generated by the human brain. OPMs enable construction of wearable magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems, which offer advantages over conventional instrumentation. However, when trying to measure signals at low frequency, higher levels of inherent sensor noise, magnetic interference and movement artefact introduce a significant challenge. Accurate characterisation of low frequency brain signals is important for neuroscientific, clinical, and paediatric MEG applications and consequently, demonstrating the viability of OPMs in this area is critical. Here, we undertake measurement of theta band (4-8 Hz) neural oscillations and contrast a newly developed 174 channel triaxial wearable OPM-MEG system with conventional (cryogenic-MEG) instrumentation. Our results show that visual steady state responses at 4 Hz, 6 Hz and 8 Hz can be recorded using OPM-MEG with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that is not significantly different to conventional MEG. Moreover, we measure frontal midline theta oscillations during a 2-back working memory task, again demonstrating comparable SNR for both systems. We show that individual differences in both the amplitude and spatial signature of induced frontal-midline theta responses are maintained across systems. Finally, we show that our OPM-MEG results could not have been achieved without a triaxial sensor array, or the use of postprocessing techniques. Our results demonstrate the viability of OPMs for characterising theta oscillations and add weight to the argument that OPMs can replace cryogenic sensors as the fundamental building block of MEG systems.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetoencephalographyChildHumansMagnetic FieldsSignal-To-Noise RatioLow frequencyMagnetoencephalographyNeural oscillationsOptically pumped magnetometersTheta oscillationsWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID36918138
PMCPMC10465234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.