Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917856›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2023

Fibers in smaller fascicles have lower activation thresholds with cuff electrodes due to thinner perineurium and smaller cross-sectional area.

Christopher J Davis, Eric D Musselman, Warren M Grill, Nicole A Pelot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Few-shot segmentation and fiber tractography of human vagus nerve using 3D-MUSE imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  14. Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J DavisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-9966
Eric D MusselmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-7267
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6588
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2844-0190
Duke University · US

Funding

Modeling Activation and Block of Autonomic Nerves for Analysis and DesignOT2OD025340 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2017 to 2021
$5.9M
NIH HHS OT2 OD025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve TissueAnimalsAxonsElectrodes, ImplantedHumansMammalsPeripheral Nervesfinite element methodneural computational modelingneural engineeringneural prostheticsneuroengineeringperipheral nerve stimulationvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36917856
PMCPMC10410695
OpenAlexW4324134283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.