Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917584›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Effects of different cardiopulmonary resuscitation education interventions among university students: A randomized controlled trial.

Yu-Tung Chang, Kun-Chia Wu, Hsiang-Wen Yang, Chung-Yi Lin, Tzu-Fu Huang, Yi-Chi Yu, Yih-Jin Hu

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Utilization of advanced resuscitation skills among doctors and nurses in Uganda.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Tung ChangDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7540-6035
Kun-Chia WuDepartment of Medical VR, HTC Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Wen YangTaiwan SAVEANNE Education Association, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Yi LinDepartment of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelong, Taiwan.
Tzu-Fu HuangDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Chi YuDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yih-Jin HuDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan Normal University · TWHTC (Taiwan) · TWNational Taiwan Ocean University · TWTaiwan Nurses Association · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for the public may improve bystander intention to perform CPR on cardiac arrest patients. Studies have shown that different CPR education intervention methods can improve learning performance, with key indicators including attitude toward to CPR, intention to perform CPR, and degree of CPR knowledge and skills. The present study compared the traditional face-to-face method to hybrid and virtual reality (VR) methods to observe difference in learning performance and length of performance retention. This study adopted randomized controlled trial to compare CPR learning performance between traditional face-to-face, hybrid, and VR methods. Participants from each intervention group completed a pretest and 2 posttests. The measurement tools included an attitude and intention questionnaire, knowledge examination, and skill examination with a RESUSCI ANNE QCPR ® manikin. The performance among all participants in pretest showed no significant difference between the intervention groups, indicating no difference in their background attitude, knowledge, and skill level. Significant differences were observed in the average degree of intention to perform CPR between the hybrid and traditional groups in 1st and 2nd posttest. Compared to the pretest results, the posttests revealed significantly higher attitude toward CPR, intention to perform CPR, knowledge examination results, accuracy of overall chest compression, accuracy of CPR procedure, accuracy of AED usage, accuracy of chest compression rate, and accuracy of chest compression depth. The average time to reattending CPR learning and practice session was 11-12 weeks reported by participants. The hybrid and VR methods to CPR education resulted in the same level of improvement in learning performance as traditional face-to-face teaching. The suggested frequency for renewing CPR knowledge and skills is 12 weeks which may be considered in new strategies aimed at promoting CPR education and exposure to the public.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestHumansManikinsStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID36917584
PMCPMC10013893
OpenAlexW4324129081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read59
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.