ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023
Interpreting Transient Interactions of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Search of Shape in the Unshaped: Constructing Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Biophysics reviews · 2026Article
- IDBSpred: An intrinsically disordered binding site predictor using machine learning and protein language model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Intrinsically disordered SERBP1 regulates translation through topology-driven G-quadruplex recognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Structural and Functional Relevance of Charge-Based Transient Interactions inside Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2025Article
- Use of AI-methods over MD simulations in the sampling of conformational ensembles in IDPs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Structural and Functional Relevance of Charge Based Transient Interactions inside Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The flexible nature of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) gives rise to a conformational ensemble with a diverse set of conformations. The simplest way to describe this ensemble is through a homopolymer model without any specific interactions. However, there has been growing evidence that the conformational properties of IDPs and their relevant functions can be affected by transient interactions between specific and even nonlocal pairs of amino acids. Interpreting these interactions from experimental methods, each of which is most sensitive to a different distance regime referred to as probing length, remains a challenging and unsolved problem. Here, we first show that transient interactions can be realized between short fragments of charged amino acids by generating conformational ensembles using model disordered peptides and coarse-grained simulations. Using these ensembles, we investigate how sensitive different types of experimental measurements are to the presence of transient interactions. We find methods with shorter probing lengths to be more appropriate for detecting these transient interactions, but one experimental method is not sufficient due to the existence of other weak interactions typically seen in IDPs. Finally, we develop an adjusted polymer model with an additional short-distance peak which can robustly reproduce the distance distribution function from two experimental measurements with complementary short and long probing lengths. This new model can suggest whether a homopolymer model is insufficient for describing a specific IDP and meets the challenge of quantitatively identifying specific, transient interactions from a background of nonspecific, weak interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.