ArticleAdvances in therapy2023
Concept Elicitation Interviews and Conceptual Model to Understand the Patient Experience of Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Doubt to Diagnosis: Canadian Patient Perspectives on a Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Diagnosis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- A novel homozygous variant (c.5876T > C: p. Leu1959Pro) in DYSF segregates with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy: a case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLimb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are a group of rare and heterogeneous disorders involving progressive wasting of shoulder and pelvic girdle musculature. This study aimed to generate qualitative evidence on patient and caregiver experiences with symptoms and impacts of LGMD on overall function and daily life for sarcoglycanopathy subtypes 2C/R5, 2D/R3, and 2E/R4.
methodsTwenty-three individuals with LGMD with (n = 5) or without (n = 18) a caregiver participated in 60-minute semi-structured video interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Differences in patient experience by ambulation status and LGMD subtype were examined.
resultsParticipants were ambulatory (n = 14) and non-ambulatory (n = 9), representing three subtypes: 2C/R5 (n = 4), 2D/R3 (n = 12), and 2E/R4 (n = 7), with mean age of 34.8 years (SD = 16.08). 56.5% identified as female. Conceptual saturation was achieved within 18/23 interviews. Ambulatory participants identified difficulty with complex physical activities, e.g., running (n = 11, 78.6%), physical strength (n = 14, 100%), and difficulty with transfers, e.g., difficulty getting off the floor (n = 10, 71.4%). All non-ambulatory participants discussed problems with activities of daily living (ADLs) and transfers, e.g., getting in/out of bed and upper extremity function, particularly reaching (n = 8, 88.9%) and fine motor skills (n = 6, 66.7%). Fatigue and pain were reported by the majority of participants (n = 16, 69.6% and n = 19, 82.6%, respectively). A conceptual disease model was developed illustrating symptoms and impacts and their relationships to disease stage, capturing the patient experience across LGMD disease trajectory.
conclusionsThis study contributes to the limited evidence describing the patient experience of living with LGMD. The conceptual model can inform patient-centered assessment in future LGMD clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.