Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917418›Full record

SynthesisApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2023

Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines.

Jaume F Lalanza, Sonia Lorente, Raimon Bullich, Carlos García, Josep-Maria Losilla, Lluis Capdevila

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaume F LalanzaDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Sonia LorenteDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Raimon BullichDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Carlos GarcíaDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Josep-Maria LosillaDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Lluis CapdevilaDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. lluis.capdevila@uab.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual's resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) "Optimal RF" (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) "Individual RF" (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) "Preset-pace RF" (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyRespiratory Sinus ArrhythmiaExhalationHeart RateHumansRespiratory RateChecklistDeep breathingGuidelinesHeart Rate Variability BiofeedbackResonance frequencyRSA

Identifiers

PMID36917418
PMCPMC10412682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.