Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917405›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2023

Validation of the DoseCalcs Monte Carlo code for estimating the

Tarik El Ghalbzouri, Tarek El Bardouni, Jaafar El Bakkali, Hafssa Ziani, Abderrahim Doudouh

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Re-evaluation ofPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tarik El GhalbzouriERSN Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, Tetouan, Morocco. imttarikk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8571-7574
Tarek El BardouniERSN Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, Tetouan, Morocco.
Jaafar El BakkaliERSN Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, Tetouan, Morocco.
Hafssa ZianiERSN Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, Tetouan, Morocco.
Abderrahim DoudouhERSN Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, Tetouan, Morocco.
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University · MAMohammed V University · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal radiation exposure using radiopharmaceuticals, as in nuclear medicine procedures, necessitates the estimation of the S-value to determine and improve the estimates of absorbed doses in at-risk organs and tissues. The S value is defined as the absorbed dose in the target organ per unit of nuclear transformation in the source organ. It is calculated using the specific absorbed fraction, which is an important quantity that connects the deposited energy in the target and emitting source organs. In this study, we applied DoseCalcs, a new Geant4-based tool, to estimate the S values of [Formula: see text]F using nuclear data from ICRP Publication 107. Geometrical data from ICRP Publications 110 and 143 were used to select four models representing male and female phantoms for adults and 15 years old to study the variability in the S-values arising from variations in anatomy and initial energy validations, because we used the [Formula: see text] mean energy instead of the full beta spectrum. The [Formula: see text]F-released photons and [Formula: see text] from 26 source organs were tracked using the Geant4 Livermore package. Accordingly, the S-values were calculated for 141 target organs. The results for the adult male and female phantoms were compared with the OpenDose reference data. These results agreed well with OpenDose, the average ratio for self-absorption S-values was 1.015, and the average ratios for the cross-irradiation were 1.2 and 1.22 for the AM and AF, respectively. This indicates the accuracy of DoseCalcs for subsequent use in estimating [Formula: see text]F S-values using voxelized geometries.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyRadiation ExposureAdultFemaleHumansMalePhantoms, ImagingPhotonsRadiation DosageComputational phantomDoseCalcsGeant4Monte CarloNuclear medicineS-value

Identifiers

PMID36917405
OpenAlexW4324129398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.