ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023
Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using the power of artificial intelligence to improve the diagnosis and management of nonmelanoma skin cancer.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Navigating the AI tide: challenges, opportunities, and future directions for early-career dermatologists.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Disseminate Cutaneous Vasculitis Associated with Durvalumab Treatment-Case Report, Mini-Review on Cutaneous Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies with Machine Learning Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Barriers and Enablers Influencing the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe development and implementation of artificial intelligence is beginning to impact the care of dermatology patients. Although the clinical application of AI in dermatology to date has largely focused on melanoma, the prevalence of non-melanoma skin cancers, including basal cell and squamous cell cancers, is a critical application for this technology. The need for a timely diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers makes finding more time efficient diagnostic methods a top priority, and AI may help improve dermatologists' performance and facilitate care in the absence of dermatology expertise. Beyond diagnosis, for more severe cases, AI may help in predicting therapeutic response and replacing or reinforcing input from multidisciplinary teams. AI may also help in designing novel therapeutics. Despite this potential, enthusiasm in AI must be tempered by realistic expectations regarding performance. AI can only perform as well as the information that is used to train it, and development and implementation of new guidelines to improve transparency around training and performance of algorithms is key for promoting confidence in new systems. Special emphasis should be placed on the role of dermatologists in curating high-quality datasets that reflect a range of skin tones, diagnoses, and clinical scenarios. For ultimate success, dermatologists must not be wary of AI as a potential replacement for their expertise, but as a new tool to complement their diagnostic acumen and extend patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.