Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2023
A randomised interventional parallel study to evaluate the effect of different frequencies of pelvic floor muscle exercises with core stabilisation using three-dimensional ultrasound: the PELSTAB study.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe primary objective was to compare high- and low-frequency pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with the impact on urinary incontinence episode frequency over 1 week (IEF/week). The secondary objective was to compare the two groups with regard to pelvic floor muscle function, morphometry, incontinence quality of life, and patient global impression.
methodsThis was a randomised parallel controlled study. The setting was regional gynaecological and urological outpatient clinics. The subjects consisted of a sample of 86 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Group A underwent high-frequency PFMT and group B underwent low-frequency PFMT for 12 weeks. We recorded the IEF/week. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was used. Pelvic floor muscle function was evaluated using a perineometer. Pelvic floor muscle morphometry was evaluated with 3D/4D ultrasound. The Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QoL) was used.
resultsSignificant differences between group A and B after treatment (p<0.001) were noted in favour of group A in IEF/week (group A 10.2±7.0/2.3±3.0 vs group B 9.3±4.7/6.3±4.9), in the ICIQ-UI SF (group A 9.7±3.0/3.7 ± 3.6 vs group B 9.9±3.2/9.4±3.4). Significant differences between groups A and B after treatment were noted in favour of group A for pelvic floor muscle function in terms of maximal voluntary contraction and its duration, and also for pelvic floor muscle morphometry in terms of a reduction of the hiatal area during rest, contraction, and the Valsalva manoeuvre.
conclusionsHigh-frequency PFMT for 12 weeks significantly decreased IEF/week in comparison with low-frequency PFMT. In the high-frequency exercise group, women had significantly better pelvic floor muscle function, morphometry and quality of life than the low-frequency exercise group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36917257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.