Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917164›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Web-Based Digital Storytelling for Endometriosis and Pain: Qualitative Pilot Study.

A Fuchsia Howard, Heather Noga, Gurkiran Parmar, Lan Kennedy, Sarah Aragones, Roop Bassra, Lauren Gelfer, Edurne Lopez de Arbina, Jessica Sutherland, Catherine Allaire and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The use of Arts-Based Research in Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A Fuchsia HowardSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-1733
Heather NogaWomen's Health Research Institute, British Columbia Women's Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-6072
Gurkiran ParmarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-1011
Lan KennedyEndometriosis Patient Advisory Board, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-1462
Sarah AragonesEndometriosis Patient Advisory Board, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-9862
Roop BassraEndometriosis Patient Advisory Board, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-632X
Lauren GelferEndometriosis Patient Advisory Board, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-5549
Edurne Lopez de ArbinaEndometriosis Patient Advisory Board, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6508-1030
Jessica SutherlandEndometriosis Patient Advisory Board, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8229-2785
Catherine AllaireDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-5660
John L OliffeSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-4003
Leanne M CurrieSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-2809
Holly YagerReproductive Health and Fertility Counselling, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-7736
Paul J YongWomen's Health Research Institute, British Columbia Women's Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5521-3052
B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAWomen's Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a complex chronic disease characterized by pain, including painful sex, that can contribute to considerable sexual function, self-esteem, and relationship challenges. Digital storytelling is an arts-based, participatory methodology wherein individuals create and share their illness experiences in detailing their lived experiences.

objectiveThe study objective was to pilot-test a web-based digital storytelling workshop focused on endometriosis to understand storytellers' experiences of workshop participation. We assessed the feasibility of story cocreation and sharing, including the emotional impact of workshop participation, the acceptability of the workshop for the subject matter, and the storytellers' willingness to share their stories with broader audiences as a method for knowledge translation.

methodsThis study used a community-based participatory methodology supplemented with patient-oriented research and integrated knowledge translation. Study participants, referred to as storytellers, cocreated 3- to 5-minute individual digital stories about their lived experiences of endometriosis during a web-based workshop (comprising five 2-hour sessions over 6 weeks) facilitated by The Center for Digital Storytelling. Data were collected through participant observations at the workshop, storyteller weekly reflective journals, and an end-of-workshop focus group interview with storytellers. These data were analyzed using a qualitative interpretive description approach.

resultsA total of 5 women and 1 nonbinary storyteller aged 19 to 39 years who had experienced endometriosis for 4 to 22 years participated in the study. We characterized storytelling workshop participation and the acceptability of story cocreation by describing participants' experiences of opportunity, commitment, and connection; complex emotions that were healing; and a desire to share. Feasibility was demonstrated through 100% engagement in the workshops. All 6 storytellers reported feeling empowered by publicly sharing their cocreated digital stories through social media and the Sex, Pain & Endometriosis website.

conclusionsDespite the complexities of the story-building process, the workshop and the cocreation and sharing of digital stories were feasible. The storytellers found that this process allowed for emotional healing and personal empowerment by offering a unique way to talk about painful sex, which also facilitated a connection among those in the workshop. The use of digital storytelling as a knowledge translation tool shows promise, and this approach also has potential as a therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

arts-based researchchronic paincommunity-based participatory researchdigital storytellingdyspareuniaendometriosisgroup therapyintegrated knowledge translationpainpainful sexpatient-oriented researchqualitative researchsex therapy

Identifiers

PMID36917164
PMCPMC10131752
OpenAlexW4324128999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.