Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917119›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2023

Topical Ocular TRPV1 Antagonist SAF312 (Libvatrep) for Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Vance Thompson, Majid Moshirfar, Thomas Clinch, Stephen Scoper, Steven H Linn, Avery McIntosh, Yifang Li, Matt Eaton, Michael Ferriere, Kalliopi Stasi

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Directions for analgesic development.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vance ThompsonVance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Majid MoshirfarHoopes, Durrie, Rivera Research, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Thomas ClinchEye Doctors of Washington, Washington, DC, USA.
Stephen ScoperVirginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Steven H LinnHoopes, Durrie, Rivera Research, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Avery McIntoshNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Yifang LiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Matt EatonNovartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael FerriereNovartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kalliopi StasiNovartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Novartis (United States) · USHoopes Vision · USUniversity of South Dakota · USVirginia Eye Consultants · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of safety and efficacy of topical ocular SAF312 (Libvatrep) in post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain. Methods: In this placebo (vehicle)-controlled, participant- and investigator-masked study, 40 participants were randomized (1:1) to two treatment sequences in a bilateral PRK crossover design (SAF312 2.5% followed by vehicle [or vice versa], one eye drop, four times daily for 72 hours after PRK). Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 6 hours after first drop of study drug and average VAS scores over 0 to 12 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included postoperative oral rescue medication (ORM) use and adverse events (AEs). Results: All 40 participants completed the study. Both primary endpoints were met; mean difference in VAS pain scores between SAF312- and vehicle-treated eyes was -11.13 (P = 0.005, -25%) at 6 hours postoperatively and -8.56 (P = 0.017, -22%) over 0 to 12 hours. Mean VAS pain scores with SAF312 were consistently lower than with vehicle from 1 hour postoperatively up to 30 hours (P ≤ 0.10 observed in 8/11 time points). Less ORM was taken with SAF312 up to 0 to 72 hours postoperatively, with a trend of fewer participants taking ORM at 0 to 24 hours postoperatively with SAF312 versus vehicle. No serious AEs were reported. All ocular AEs were mild and transient, and none were drug related. SAF312-treated eyes showed no delay in wound healing and had a lower grade 4 conjunctival hyperemia 24 hours postoperatively versus vehicle-treated eyes. Conclusions: SAF312 was well tolerated and effective in reducing ocular pain post-PRK. Translational Relevance: Topical SAF312 presents a new therapeutic option for patients undergoing PRK.

Indexed as

Photorefractive KeratectomyHumansPostoperative PainTRPV Cation ChannelsWound HealingTRPV1 protein, humanTRPV Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID36917119
PMCPMC10020951
OpenAlexW4324129773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read57
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.