Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36917004›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2023

Platelet-Lymphocyte and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratios Are Prognostic Markers for Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas.

Xu Zhong, TingWei Su, Yifan Yang, Lei Ye, Lei Jiang, Yan Qi, Jing Xie, Yiran Jiang, Weiwei Zhou, Cui Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The evolving roles of pathologists in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inflammation-based Scores in Patients With Pheochromocytoma.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xu ZhongDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
TingWei SuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yifan YangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Lei YeDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Lei JiangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yan QiDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Jing XieDepartment of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yiran JiangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Weiwei ZhouDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Cui ZhangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Luming WuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Hongyuan ZhuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Guang NingDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Weiqing WangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-3084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPreoperative inflammatory markers, such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), have recently been proposed as prognostic markers in different tumors. However, their predictive values in patients with pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are uncertain.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of inflammatory biomarkers in PPGL patients.

methodsData from 1247 consecutive PPGL patients between 2002 and 2020 were evaluated. The preoperative inflammatory markers were evaluated. The prognostic roles were identified by X-tile software, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression models.

resultsA total of 728 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 63 months (IQR, 31-111 months); 31 individuals died, 28 patients developed metastases, and 12 patients developed recurrence. Our study showed that deaths were observed significantly more frequently in patients with high NLR(≥3.5) and high PLR (≥217.4) than those with low NLR (<3.5) (P = .003) and low PLR (<217.4) (P = .005). Elevated NLR (≥3.5) and elevated PLR (≥217.4) was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (OS) (P = .005), and elevated PLR (≥238.3) was significantly associated with decreased metastasis-free survival (MFS) (P = .021). Cox models illustrated that NLR and PLR were independent prognostic factors for OS, and PLR was an independent prognostic factor for MFS.

conclusionBoth elevated NLR and PLR are associated with poor prognosis in PPGLs. They are convenient predictive markers that could be used in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsParagangliomaPheochromocytomaBlood PlateletsHumansLymphocytesNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesNLRoverall survivalpheochromocytomas and paragangliomasPLRprognostic markers

Identifiers

PMID36917004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.