ArticleInternational journal of neural systems2023
Electrical Stimulation Induced Current Distribution in Peripheral Nerves Varies Significantly with the Extent of Nerve Damage: A Computational Study Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network and Realistic Nerve Models.
Article in International journal of neural systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling strategies in non-invasive spinal stimulation: perspectives on state-of-the-art.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Reduce electrical overload via threaded Chinese acupuncture in nerve electrical therapy.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Toward Safety Protocols for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS): A Computational and Experimental Approach.Bioelectromagnetics · 2025Article
- Electric field stimulation directs target-specific axon regeneration and partial restoration of vision after optic nerve crush injury.PloS one · 2025Article
- Machine learning enables non-Gaussian investigation of changes to peripheral nerves related to electrical stimulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of the peripheral nervous system is a promising therapeutic option for several conditions; however, its effects on tissue and the safety of the stimulation remain poorly understood. In order to devise stimulation protocols that enhance therapeutic efficacy without the risk of causing tissue damage, we constructed computational models of peripheral nerve and stimulation cuffs based on extremely high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves using the most recent advances in computing power and machine learning techniques. We developed nerve models using nonstimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to explore how nerve damage affects the induced current density distribution. Using our in-house computational, quasi-static, platform, and the Admittance Method (AM), we estimated the induced current distribution within the nerves and compared it for healthy and damaged nerves. We also estimated the extent of localized cell damage in both healthy and damaged nerve samples. When the nerve is damaged, as demonstrated principally by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper into the over-stimulated nerve than in the healthy sample. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves still refer to the Shannon criterion to distinguish between safe and unsafe stimulation, the capability this work demonstrated is an important step toward the development of safety criteria that are specific to peripheral nerve and make use of the latest advances in computational bioelectromagnetics and machine learning, such as Python-based AM and CNN-based nerve image segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.