Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916993›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neural systems2023

Electrical Stimulation Induced Current Distribution in Peripheral Nerves Varies Significantly with the Extent of Nerve Damage: A Computational Study Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network and Realistic Nerve Models.

Jinze Du, Andres Morales, Pragya Kosta, Jean-Marie C Bouteiller, Gema Martinez-Navarrete, David J Warren, Eduardo Fernandez, Gianluca Lazzi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neural systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinze DuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Andres MoralesDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Pragya KostaInstitute for Technology and Medical Systems (ITEMS), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Jean-Marie C BouteillerInstitute for Technology and Medical Systems (ITEMS), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Gema Martinez-NavarreteInstitute of Bioengineering, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche and CIBER-BBN, Spain.
David J WarrenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Eduardo FernandezInstitute of Bioengineering, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche and CIBER-BBN, Spain.
Gianluca LazziDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
University of Southern California · USUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Supplement to CRCNS US-Spain: Computational Modeling of PNS StimulationR01EB029271 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LAZZI, GIANLUCA · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the peripheral nervous system is a promising therapeutic option for several conditions; however, its effects on tissue and the safety of the stimulation remain poorly understood. In order to devise stimulation protocols that enhance therapeutic efficacy without the risk of causing tissue damage, we constructed computational models of peripheral nerve and stimulation cuffs based on extremely high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves using the most recent advances in computing power and machine learning techniques. We developed nerve models using nonstimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to explore how nerve damage affects the induced current density distribution. Using our in-house computational, quasi-static, platform, and the Admittance Method (AM), we estimated the induced current distribution within the nerves and compared it for healthy and damaged nerves. We also estimated the extent of localized cell damage in both healthy and damaged nerve samples. When the nerve is damaged, as demonstrated principally by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper into the over-stimulated nerve than in the healthy sample. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves still refer to the Shannon criterion to distinguish between safe and unsafe stimulation, the capability this work demonstrated is an important step toward the development of safety criteria that are specific to peripheral nerve and make use of the latest advances in computational bioelectromagnetics and machine learning, such as Python-based AM and CNN-based nerve image segmentation.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSciatic NerveAnimalsElectric StimulationRatsComputational modelelectrical stimulationperipheral nervetissue safety

Identifiers

PMID36916993
PMCPMC10561898
OpenAlexW4319158058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.