Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916762›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023

MAHOMES II: A webserver for predicting if a metal binding site is enzymatic.

Ryan Feehan, Matthew Copeland, Meghan W Franklin, Joanna S G Slusky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Zero-shot design of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Interpretable prediction of zinc ion location in proteins with ZincSight.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. MAHOMES II: A webserver for predicting if a metal binding site is enzymatic.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan FeehanCenter for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Dr, 66047, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Matthew CopelandCenter for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Dr, 66047, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Meghan W FranklinCenter for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Dr, 66047, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Joanna S G SluskyCenter for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Dr, 66047, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0842-6340

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Douglas E Wright · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
DESIGNED BETA-STRANDS FOR INHIBITING EFFLUX PUMPS AND DISABLING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCEDP2GM128201 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SLUSKY, JOANNA SG · 2017 to 2017
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM128201NIGMS NIH HHS DP2GM128201NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances have enabled high-quality computationally generated structures for proteins with no solved crystal structures. However, protein function data remains largely limited to experimental methods and homology mapping. Since structure determines function, it is natural that methods capable of using computationally generated structures for functional annotations need to be advanced. Our laboratory recently developed a method to distinguish between metalloenzyme and nonenzyme sites. Here we report improvements to this method by upgrading our physicochemical features to alleviate the need for structures with sub-angstrom precision and using machine learning to reduce training data labeling error. Our improved classifier identifies protein bound metal sites as enzymatic or nonenzymatic with 94% precision and 92% recall. We demonstrate that both adjustments increased predictive performance and reliability on sites with sub-angstrom variations. We constructed a set of predicted metalloprotein structures with no solved crystal structures and no detectable homology to our training data. Our model had an accuracy of 90%-97.5% depending on the quality of the predicted structures included in our test. Finally, we found the physicochemical trends that drove this model's successful performance were local protein density, second shell ionizable residue burial, and the pocket's accessibility to the site. We anticipate that our model's ability to correctly identify catalytic metal sites could enable identification of new enzymatic mechanisms and improve de novo metalloenzyme design success rates.

Indexed as

MetalloproteinsBinding SitesCatalytic DomainMetalsReproducibility of ResultsMetalloproteinsMetalsenzymesmachine learningmetalloenzymesmetalloproteins

Identifiers

PMID36916762
PMCPMC10044107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.