ArticleMedical physics2023
Simulation studies of a full-ring, CZT SPECT system for whole-body imaging of
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of dual-energy window scatter correction on technetium image quality across different energy windows in cadmium-zinc-telluride-based SPECT/CT.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Individual and Simultaneous Imaging ofIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025Article
- EANM perspectives for CZT SPECT in brain applications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- A Technique to Quantify Very Low Activities in Regions of Interest With a Collimatorless Detector.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Performance study of a 360° CZT camera for monitoringEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is an imaging modality that has demonstrated its utility in a number of clinical indications. Despite this progress, a high sensitivity, high spatial resolution, multi-tracer SPECT with a large field of view suitable for whole-body imaging of a broad range of radiotracers for theranostics is not available. PURPOSE: With the goal of filling this technological gap, we have designed a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) full-ring SPECT scanner instrumented with a broad-energy tungsten collimator. The final purpose is to provide a multi-tracer solution for brain and whole-body imaging. Our static SPECT does not rely on the dual- and the triple-head rotational SPECT standard paradigm, enabling a larger effective area in each scan to increase the sensitivity. We provide a demonstration of the performance of our design using a realistic model of our detector with simulated body-sized phantoms filled with
methodsWe create a realistic model of our detector by using a combination of a Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) Monte Carlo simulation and a finite element model for the CZT response, accounting for low-energy tail effects in CZT that affects the sensitivity and the scatter correction. We implement a modified dual-energy-window scatter correction adapted for CZT. Other corrections for attenuation, detector and collimator response, and detector gaps and edges are also included. The images are reconstructed using the maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization. Detector and reconstruction performance are characterized with point sources, Derenzo phantoms, and a body-sized National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Image Quality (IQ) phantom for both
resultsOur SPECT design can resolve 7.9 mm rods for
conclusionsIn this paper, we demonstrate the good performance of our design for whole-body imaging purposes. This adds to our previous demonstration of improved qualitative and quantitative
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.