Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916539›Full record

SynthesisCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Tamoxifen use and risk of endometrial cancer in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Matin Ghanavati, Yasaman Khorshidi, Mahdi Shadnoush, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Seyed Hossein Ardehali, Yanin Chavarri-Guerra, Atieh Akbari, Regina Barragan-Carrillo, Manoochehr Amin Amlashi, Zeinab Javid and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Influence of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on tamoxifen side effects in patients with breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Standardized gynecologic consultation and bone surveillance in patients with breast cancer receiving hormone therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Matin GhanavatiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Science and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yasaman KhorshidiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Science and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi ShadnoushDepartment of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Science and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Esmaeil AkbariCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-3587
Seyed Hossein ArdehaliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yanin Chavarri-GuerraDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Atieh AkbariCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Regina Barragan-CarrilloDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Manoochehr Amin AmlashiDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zeinab JavidDepartment of Nutrition, Farhikhtegan hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Jamal RahmaniCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-7854
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRNational Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute · IRInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXIran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorse prognosis of endometrial cancers (EC) in tamoxifen-treated women compared to non-tamoxifen-treated women been proposed. The relationship between tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer (BC) and the risk of EC is controversial and there is no agreement between publication results on this issue (the answer to all comments provided in the page 2 of manuscript). The aim of this study is investigation the association between tamoxifen treatment and the risk of EC in patients with BC. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a comprehensive search with related keywords in MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases until April 16, 2022. Random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of EC. Dose, cumulative dose, and duration-response analysis were performed in linear and non-linear states. Twenty-six studies reported a relation between tamoxifen treatment and risk of EC in patients with BC. Results showed a direct relationship between tamoxifen use and EC (RR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.68-2.45; I2:76%). By increase the age of participants, the risk of EC was decrease (coef = -.0206), although this was not statistically significant (p = .37). Linear dose-response model indicated a direct significant association between dose and duration use of tamoxifen and EC (dose: exe(b) = 1.019, p = .001; duration: exe(b) = 1.014, p = .001). Non-linear dose-response analysis confirmed linear analysis.

conclusionThis study highlights that tamoxifen use is a significant risk factor related to the incidence of EC in patients with BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsTamoxifenTamoxifenbreast cancerdose-responseendometrial cancertamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID36916539
PMCPMC10075294
OpenAlexW4324129663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.