ArticleCancer medicine2023
Clinical application of the anti-human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) antibody (SCD-A7) immunocytochemistry in liquid-based urine cytology: A prospective, single institute study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncolytic adenoviruses in bladder and kidney cancers: emerging strategies and next frontiers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Review of hTERT-Immortalized Cells: How to Assess Immortality and Confirm Identity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells Are Frequently Found in the Urine of Prostate Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2023Article
- Clinical application of the anti-human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) antibody (SCD-A7) immunocytochemistry in liquid-based urine cytology: A prospective, single institute study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUrine cytology is the most widely used noninvasive screening tool for urothelial carcinoma diagnosis and surveillance. Although highly specific, urine cytology exhibits suboptimal sensitivity. This study aimed to determine whether hTERT immunocytochemistry (ICC) could be applicable as an ancillary test in routine cytology practice.
methodsA total of 561 urinary tract samples were initially screened in this study. All of them were prepared using SurePath liquid-based cytology (LBC), while additional LBC slides were made and subsequently used for hTERT (SCD-A7) ICC.
resultsFrom the 561 samples screened, 337 were finally analyzed, all having an adequate cellularity and available follow-up histology. The hTERT ICC-positive rate was 95.9% (n = 208/217), 96% (n = 24/25), and 100% (n = 4/4) in cytology samples with high-grade urothelial carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and low-grade urothelial carcinoma subsequent histology. Among the 64 atypical cytology cases histologically confirmed as urothelial carcinomas, 92.2% (n = 59/64) were immunoreactive to hTERT, whereas the two histologically benign cases were ICC-negative. 87/90 (96.7%) of the cytology cases confirmed to be benign in follow-up were hTERT-negative. The overall sensitivity and specificity of hTERT ICC were 96.3% and 98.8%, respectively (AUROC = 0.963; 95% CI = 0.960-0.967).
conclusionsThe hTERT ICC test exhibited consistent and intense staining in malignant urothelial cells, suggesting its value as an ancillary test in liquid-based urine cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.