Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916410›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Integrated gene profiling of fine-needle aspiration sample improves lymph node metastasis risk stratification for thyroid cancer.

Weituo Zhang, Xinwei Yun, Tianyu Xu, Xiaoqing Wang, Qiang Li, Tiantian Zhang, Li Xie, Suna Wang, Dapeng Li, Xi Wei and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weituo ZhangHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xinwei YunNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Tianyu XuHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqing WangNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Qiang LiHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tiantian ZhangHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li XieHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1892-2217
Suna WangHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dapeng LiNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Xi WeiNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4734-3900
Yang YuNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Biyun QianHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital and Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-7300
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node metastasis risk stratification is crucial for the surgical decision-making of thyroid cancer. This study investigated whether the integrated gene profiling (combining expression, SNV, fusion) of Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) samples can improve the prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients with papillary thyroid cancer who went through thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection were included. Multi-omics data of FNA samples were assessed by an integrated array. To predict lymph node metastasis, we built models using gene expressions or mutations (SNV and fusion) only and an Integrated Risk Stratification (IRS) model combining genetic and clinical information. Blinded histopathology served as the reference standard. ROC curve and decision curve analysis was applied to evaluate the predictive models.

resultsOne hundred and thirty two patients with pathologically confirmed papillary thyroid cancer were included between 2016-2017. The IRS model demonstrated greater performance [AUC = 0.87 (0.80-0.94)] than either expression classifier [AUC = 0.67 (0.61-0.74)], mutation classifier [AUC = 0.61 (0.55-0.67)] or TIRADS score [AUC = 0.68 (0.62-0.74)] with statistical significance (p < 0.001), and the IRS model had similar predictive performance in large nodule [>1 cm, AUC = 0.88 (0.79-0.97)] and small nodule [≤1 cm, AUC = 0.84 (0.74-0.93)] subgroups. The genetic risk factor showed independent predictive value (OR = 10.3, 95% CI:1.1-105.3) of lymph node metastasis in addition to the preoperative clinical information, including TIRADS grade, age, and nodule size.

conclusionThe integrated gene profiling of FNA samples and the IRS model developed by the machine-learning method significantly improve the risk stratification of thyroid cancer, thus helping make wise decisions and reducing unnecessary extensive surgeries.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentThyroid Cancer, Papillarybiomarkerfine-needle aspirationmachine learningmulti-omicsrisk stratificationthyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID36916410
PMCPMC10225186
OpenAlexW4324129068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.