Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916312›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Treatment preferences for preventive interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: protocol of a mixed methods case study for the Innovative Medicines Initiative PREFER project.

Marie Falahee, Gwenda Simons, Rachael L DiSantostefano, Larissa Valor Méndez, Christine Radawski, Matthias Englbrecht, Karin Schölin Bywall, Stephanie Tcherny-Lessenot, Ulrik Kihlbom, Brett Hauber and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Marie FalaheeRheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK m.falahee@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-486X
Gwenda SimonsRheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rachael L DiSantostefanoJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Larissa Valor MéndezDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute for Clinical Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Christine RadawskiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Matthias EnglbrechtFreelance Healthcare Data Scientist, Eckental, Germany.
Karin Schölin BywallCentre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stephanie Tcherny-LessenotGlobal Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Sanofi SA, Paris, France.
Ulrik KihlbomCentre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Brett HauberHealth Preference Assessment, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Jorien VeldwijkJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karim RazaRheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Uppsala University · SEEli Lilly (United States) · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEJanssen (United States) · USQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSanofi (France) · FRUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Washington · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmidst growing consensus that stakeholder decision-making during drug development should be informed by an understanding of patient preferences, the Innovative Medicines Initiative project 'Patient Preferences in Benefit-Risk Assessments during the Drug Life Cycle' (PREFER) is developing evidence-based recommendations about how and when patient preferences should be integrated into the drug life cycle. This protocol describes a PREFER clinical case study which compares two preference elicitation methodologies across several populations and provides information about benefit-risk trade-offs by those at risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for preventive interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed methods study will be conducted in three countries (UK, Germany, Romania) to assess preferences of (1) first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with RA and (2) members of the public. Focus groups using nominal group techniques (UK) and ranking surveys (Germany and Romania) will identify and rank key treatment attributes. Focus group transcripts will be analysed thematically using the framework method and average rank orders calculated. These results will inform the treatment attributes to be assessed in a survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a probabilistic threshold technique (PTT). The survey will also include measures of sociodemographic variables, health literacy, numeracy, illness perceptions and beliefs about medicines. The survey will be administered to (1) 400 FDRs of patients with RA (UK); (2) 100 FDRs of patients with RA (Germany); and (3) 1000 members of the public in each of UK, Germany and Romania. Logit-based approaches will be used to analyse the DCE and imputation and interval regression for the PTT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (19/LO/0407) and the Ethics Committee of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (92_17 B). The protocol has been approved by the PREFER expert review board. The results will be disseminated widely and will inform the PREFER recommendations.

Indexed as

preventive medicinepublic healthrheumatology

Identifiers

PMID36916312
PMCPMC8039213
OpenAlexW3155774611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.