Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916186›Full record

Trial reportKorean journal of anesthesiology2023

Modified pectoral nerve block versus bi-level erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Sevim Cesur, Can Aksu, Sertaç Ata Güler, Alparslan Kuş

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06480045 (Usage Of Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Usg In Application of Pectoral Block In Mastectomies), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06480045 nacompletednot on this map

Usage Of Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Usg In Application of Pectoral Block In Mastectomies

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaskent UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsPerformed PECS II block with AI integrated USG, Performed PECS II block with conventional USG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. The Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Practical Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sevim CesurDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Can AksuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Sertaç Ata GülerDepartment of General Surgery, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Alparslan KuşDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Kocaeli Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegional anesthesia techniques constitute an important part of successful analgesia strategies in the perioperative care of patients undergoing breast surgery. The advent of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has led to the development of fascial plane blocks. The large array of blocks available for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery has increased the accessibility of regional anesthesia but has also created a dilemma of choice. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided modified pectoral nerve (PECS) block and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing radical mastectomy.

methodsSeventy women were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, randomized control trial. After exclusion, 67 female patients who underwent radical mastectomy were finally analyzed. Ultrasound-guided PECS blocks and ESPBs were performed with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. Postoperative morphine and pain scores were compared between the groups.

resultsPostoperative total morphine consumption in the first 24 h was significantly higher in the PECS group (P < 0.001). The ESPB group exhibited significantly reduced morphine consumption at all postoperative time points. Numeric rating scale scores were lower in the ESPB group at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively at rest and when coughing.

conclusionsUltrasound-guided bi-level ESPBs provided better postoperative analgesia than PECS blocks after radical mastectomy surgery.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBreast NeoplasmsNerve BlockThoracic NervesAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, RadicalMorphinePostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalMorphineAnalgesiaBreast neoplasmsDiagnostic imagingLocal anestheticsNerve blockPostoperative pain.

Identifiers

PMID36916186
PMCPMC10391080
OpenAlexW4324129622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.