Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36916141›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

More GP contacts and poorer health of informal caregivers with low socioeconomic status in Germany: results from the population-based DEGS1 and the cross-sectional GPCare-1 study.

Boris Gavrilov, Manuela Schmidt, Stefanie Kasten, Samira Sommer, Carmen Hunzelar, Florian Bockheim, Joana Paños-Willuhn, Luisa Offenberg, Maja Oberholz, Nur Ikar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boris GavrilovInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany hausarztmedizin@ukbonn.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1699-193X
Manuela SchmidtInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefanie KastenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Samira SommerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Carmen HunzelarInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Florian BockheimInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Joana Paños-WilluhnInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Luisa OffenbergInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maja OberholzInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nur IkarInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Birgitta WeltermannInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInformal caregivers are known to have poorer mental health. Risk factors for caregiver burden include low education, female gender, cohabitation with the care recipient and lack of resources. General practitioners (GPs) have an important role in supporting caregivers. Drawing on data from two surveys, associations between caregivers' socioeconomic status (SES), psychophysical health and GP contacts are analysed.

designCross-sectional study. The study draws on data from two surveys (German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults, DEGS1 and General Practice Care-1, GPCare-1).

settingGermany.

participantsDEGS1: German general population (18+ years) n=7987. GPCare-1: general practice patients (18+ years) n=813. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Psychophysical health, GP contacts and communication.

methodsUsing representative DEGS1 data, the prevalence of informal caregivers, caregivers' burden, chronic stress, various health conditions and frequency of GP contacts were evaluated stratified by SES. Data from the GPCare-1 study addressed caregivers' experiences and communication preferences with GPs.

resultsIn the DEGS1, the prevalence of caregivers was 6.5%. Compared with non-caregivers, caregivers scored significantly higher for chronic stress (15.45 vs 11.90), self-reported poor health (37.6% vs 23.7%) and GP visits last year (3.95 vs 3.11), while lifestyle and chronic diseases were similar. Compared with caregivers with medium/high SES, those with low SES had a significantly lower prevalence of high/medium caregiver burden (47.9% vs 67.7%) but poorer self-reported health (56.9% vs 33.0%), while other characteristics did not differ. In the GPCare-1 study, the prevalence of caregivers was 12.6%. The majority of them felt that their GP takes their problems seriously (63.6%) without difference by SES.

conclusionCaregivers with low SES constitute an especially high-risk group for psychological strain, requiring special GP attention to support their needs.

Indexed as

Caregiver BurdenCaregiversLow Socioeconomic StatusPhysician's RoleAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansStress, Psychologicalgeneral medicine (see Internal Medicine)mental healthpublic healthquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36916141
PMCPMC8719219
OpenAlexW4206553619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.